Keyword search across all of the laws in the states. Subject-area tabs above allow you to narrow results. Click the advanced search for further refinement.
Every law can be saved to the Reform Builder
See all ability to pay policy recommendations in CJPP’s Policy Guide
Below are the ability to pay laws that meet your search criteria. Many include a See related provisions prompt which searches our database for laws that may pertain to your result.
26 Results
State | Statute | Description/Statute Name | Statutory language | Level of offense | Definition of ability to pay | Timeline | Burden of proof | Method of determination | Mandatory | Remedies if unable to pay | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Add to Dashboard
|
Maine | Me. Rev. Stat. tit 17-A § 1807(6) | Conditions of probation |
The court shall attach as a condition of probation that the person pay, through the Department of Corrections, a supervision fee of between $10 and $50 per month, as determined by the court, for the term of probation. If the court does not set a supervision fee, the supervision fee is $10 per month. Notwithstanding the attachment of supervision fee conditions on more than one sentence, a person on probation on concurrent sentences is required to pay only one supervision fee. In determining whether to set an amount higher than $10 per month, the court shall take into account the financial resources of the person and the nature of the burden its payment imposes. A person may not be sentenced to imprisonment without probation solely for the reason the person is not able to pay the fee.
|
All |
financial resources and nature of burden |
Before imposition of fine or fee | Not provided for | Determined by judge without hearing | No |
may allow additional time |
Add to Dashboard
|
Maine | Me. Rev. Stat. tit 17-A §1807(7) | Conditions of probation |
7. Electronic monitoring and substance testing fees; determination of amount by court; failure to pay; use of fees. Upon the request of the Department of Corrections, the court shall attach as a condition of probation that the person pay, through the department, an electronic monitoring fee, a substance testing fee or both, as determined by the court, for the term of probation. In determining the amount of the fees, the court shall take into account the financial resources of the person and the nature of the burden the payment imposes. A person may not be sentenced to imprisonment without probation solely for the reason the person is not able to pay the fees.
|
All |
Financial resources and nature of burden |
Before imposition of fine or fee | Not provided for | Not provided for | Yes |
Reduced fine |
Add to Dashboard
|
Maine | Me. Rev. Stat. tit 17-A §1702 | Criteria for imposing sentencing alternative that includes fine |
1. Consideration of financial capacity to pay and financial burden. In determining the amount of a fine, unless the fine amount is mandatory, and in determining the method of payment of a fine, the court shall take into account the present and future financial capacity of the convicted person to pay the fine and the nature of the financial burden that payment of the fine will impose on the person or a dependent, if any, of the person.
2. Burden of proving financial hardship or incapacity to pay. A convicted person who asserts a present or future incapacity to pay a fine or asserts that the fine will cause an excessive financial hardship on the person or on a dependent of the person has the burden of proving the incapacity or excessive hardship by a preponderance of the evidence. On appeal of a sentencing alternative involving a fine, the person has the burden of demonstrating that the incapacity or excessive financial hardship was proven as a matter of law. |
All |
By preponderance of evidence that fine would cause excessive financial hardship on offender or dependent |
Before imposition of fine or fee | Burden on defendant to show inability to pay | Determined by judge after hearing | No | Not provided for |
Add to Dashboard
|
Maine | Me. Rev. Stat. tit 17-A §2005(2)(D) | Criteria for restitution |
D. When the amount and method of payment of monetary restitution or the performance of service restitution creates an excessive financial hardship on the offender or dependent of the offender. In making this determination, all relevant factors must be considered, including, but not limited to the following:(1) The number of the offender's dependents; (2) The minimum living expenses of the offender and the offender's dependents; (3) The special needs of the offender and the offender's dependents, including necessary travel expense to and from work; (4) The offender's present income and potential future earning capacity; and (5) The offender's resources, from whatever source.
|
All |
excessive financial hardship on offender or dependents |
Before imposition of fine or fee | Not provided for | Determined by judge after hearing | No | Not provided for |
Add to Dashboard
|
Maine | Me. Rev. Stat. tit 17-A §1751(1)-(2) | County jail reimbursement fee |
1. Assessment of reimbursement fee. When an individual is sentenced to incarceration in a county jail, the sentencing court shall consider and may assess as part of the sentence a jail reimbursement fee, referred to in this section as “the reimbursement fee,” to help defray the expenses of the individual's room and board.
2. Evidence. The court, in determining whether a reimbursement fee as set out in subsection 1 is to be assessed and in establishing the amount of that fee, shall consider evidence relevant to the individual's ability to pay that fee, including, but not limited to, the factors set forth in section 2005, subsection 2, paragraph D, subparagraphs (1) to (5). The court may not consider as evidence the following: A. Joint ownership, if any, that the individual may have in real property; B. Joint ownership, if any, that the individual may have in any assets, earnings or other sources of income; and C. The income, assets, earnings or other property, both real and personal, owned by the individual's spouse or family. |
All |
excessive financial hardship on offender or dependents |
Not provided for | Not provided for | Determined by judge after hearing | Yes | Not provided for |
Add to Dashboard
|
Maine | Me. Rev. Stat. tit 17-A §1854(2)(A) | Requirements of administrative release |
In determining the amount of the fee, the court shall take into account the financial resources of the person and the nature of the burden its payment imposes. |
All |
Financial resources and nature of burden |
Before imposition of fine or fee | Not provided for | Not provided for | No | Not provided for |
Add to Dashboard
|
Maine | Me. R. of Unified Crim. P. 44(b) | Right to and Assignment of Counsel |
(b) Determination of Indigency. The court shall determine whether a defendant has sufficient means with which to employ counsel and in making such determination may examine the defendant under oath concerning the defendant's financial resources. A defendant does not have sufficient means with which to employ counsel if the defendant's lack of resources effectively prevents the defendant from retaining the services of competent counsel. In making its determination the court shall consider the following factors: the defendant's income, the defendant's credit standing, the availability and convertibility of any assets owned by the defendant, the living expenses of the defendant and the defendant's dependents, the defendant's outstanding obligations, the financial resources of the defendant's parents if the defendant is an unemancipated minor residing with his or her parents, and the cost of retaining the services of competent counsel.
|
All |
sufficient means with which to employ counsel |
Before imposition of fine or fee | Not provided for | Determined by judge after hearing | Yes |
Court appointed counsel free of costs |
Add to Dashboard
|
Maine | Me. Rev. Stat. tit 17-A §1902(1) | Deferred disposition |
1. Authority of court to order deferment and impose requirements; administrative supervision fee. Following the acceptance of a plea of guilty for a crime for which a person is eligible for a deferred disposition under section 1901, the court may order sentencing deferred to a date certain or determinable and impose requirements upon the person, to be in effect during the period of deferment, considered by the court to be reasonable and appropriate to assist the person to lead a law-abiding life. The court-imposed deferment requirements must include a requirement that the person refrain from criminal conduct and may include a requirement that the person pay to the appropriate county an administrative supervision fee of not more than $50 per month, as determined by the court, for the term of the deferment. In determining the amount of the fee, the court shall take into account the financial resources of the person and the nature of the burden its payment imposes. In exchange for the deferred sentencing, the person shall abide by the court-imposed deferment requirements. Unless the court orders otherwise, the requirements are immediately in effect.
|
All |
The financial resources of the person and the nature of the burden its payment imposes. |
Before imposition of fine or fee | Not provided for | Determined by judge without hearing | No | Not provided for |
Add to Dashboard
|
Maine | Me. Rev. Stat. tit 17-A § 1607 | Prohibition against imprisonment based on incapacity to pay fine |
If a court finds that an individual has met the burden of proving incapacity to pay a fine pursuant to section 1702, subsection 2, the court may not impose a term of imprisonment or any other sentencing alternative involving imprisonment solely for the reason that the individual does not have the present or future capacity to pay the fine.
|
All |
Not provided for |
At enforcement of fine or fee | Burden on defendant to show inability to pay | Not provided for | No | Not provided for |
Add to Dashboard
|
Texas | Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Art. 37.073 | Repayment of Rewards |
(a) After a defendant has been convicted of a felony offense, the judge may order a defendant to pay a fine repaying all or part of a reward paid by a crime stoppers organization.
(b) In determining whether the defendant must repay the reward or part of the reward, the court shall consider: (1) the ability of the defendant to make the payment and the financial hardship on the defendant to make the required payment; and (2) the importance of the information to the prosecution of the defendant as provided by the arresting officer or the attorney for the state with due regard for the confidentiality of the crime stoppers organization records. |
Felony |
Not provided for |
Before imposition of fine or fee | Not provided for | Other | Yes |
Nonpayment or partial payment/ |
Add to Dashboard
|
Texas | Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Art. 42A.452 | Treatment, Specialized Supervision, or Rehabilitation |
On a finding that the defendant is financially able to make payment, the judge shall require the defendant to pay a reimbursement fee for all or part of the reasonable and necessary costs of the treatment, supervision, or rehabilitation.
|
Felony |
Not provided for |
Before imposition of fine or fee | Not provided for | Not provided for | Yes |
None specified |
Add to Dashboard
|
Texas | Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Art. 42A.408(f) | Use of Ignition Interlock Device |
If the court determines the defendant is unable to pay for the ignition interlock device, the court may impose a reasonable payment schedule not to exceed twice the length of the period of the court’s order.
|
All |
Not provided for |
Before imposition of fine or fee | Not provided for | Not provided for | No |
Reasonable payment schedule |
Add to Dashboard
|
Texas | Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Art. 42A.303(f) | Substance Abuse Felony Program |
In establishing the amount of a fee under Subsection (d)(2), the judge shall consider fines, fees, and other necessary expenses for which the defendant is obligated. The judge may not: (1) establish the fee in an amount that is greater than 25 percent of the defendant's gross income while the defendant is a participant in residential aftercare; or (2) require the defendant to pay the fee at any time other than a time at which the defendant is both employed and a participant in residential aftercare.
|
All |
N/A |
Before imposition of fine or fee | Not provided for | Determined by judge without hearing | Yes |
N/A |
Add to Dashboard
|
Texas | Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Art. 102.020(j) | Costs Related to DNA Testing [Repealed Effective January 1, 2020] |
The court may waive the imposition of a court cost under this article if the court determines that the defendant is indigent and unable to pay the cost. |
All |
Indigent and unable to pay the cost |
Before imposition of fine or fee | Not provided for | Not provided for | No |
Not provided for |
Add to Dashboard
|
Texas | Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Art. 102.018(b) | Reimbursement Fees and Expenses Attendant to Intoxication Convictions |
Except as provided by Subsection (d), on conviction of an offense relating to the driving or operating of a motor vehicle punishable under Section 49.04(b), Penal Code, the court shall impose as a reimbursement fee on the defendant an amount that is equal to the reimbursement fee of an evaluation of the defendant performed under Article 42A.402(a). Reimbursement fees imposed under this subsection are in addition to other court costs and are due whether or not the defendant is granted community supervision in the case, except that if the court determines that the defendant is indigent and unable to pay the fee, the court may waive the imposition of the fee
|
All |
Indigent |
Before imposition of fine or fee | Not provided for | Not provided for | No |
Fee waiver |
Add to Dashboard
|
Texas | Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Art. 43.03(c) | Payment of Fine |
A court may not order a defendant confined under Subsection (a) of this article unless the court at a hearing makes a written determination that:(1) the defendant is not indigent and has failed to make a good faith effort to discharge the fines and costs; or (2) the defendant is indigent and: (A) has failed to make a good faith effort to discharge the fines and costs under Article 43.09(f); and (B) could have discharged the fines and costs under Article 43.09 without experiencing any undue hardship.
|
All |
For the purpose of establishing a right to representation by counsel, “indigent” means a person who is not financially able to employ counsel: Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 1.051. |
At enforcement of fine or fee | Not provided for | Determined by judge after hearing | Yes |
None specified |
Add to Dashboard
|
Texas | Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Art. 42A.751(i) | Violation of Conditions of Community Supervision; Detention and Hearing |
(i) In a revocation hearing at which it is alleged only that the defendant violated the conditions of community supervision by failing to pay compensation paid to appointed counsel, community supervision fees, or court costs, the state must prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the defendant was able to pay and did not pay as ordered by the judge.
|
All |
Not provided for |
At enforcement of fine or fee | Burden on government to show ability to pay | Determined by judge after hearing | Yes |
None specified |
Add to Dashboard
|
Texas | Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Art. 26.05(g) | Compensation of Counsel Appointed to Defend |
If the judge determines that a defendant has financial resources that enable the defendant to offset in part or in whole the costs of the legal services provided to the defendant in accordance with Article 1.051(c) or (d), including any expenses and costs, the judge shall order the defendant to pay during the pendency of the charges or, if convicted, as a reimbursement fee the amount that the judge finds the defendant is able to pay.
|
All |
Not provided for |
Before imposition of fine or fee | Not provided for | Determined by judge without hearing | Yes |
Pay only attorney fee that defendant can afford to pay. |
Add to Dashboard
|
Texas | Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 42.038(c)-(d) | Reimbursement for Confinement Expenses |
(c) A judge may not require reimbursement under this article if the judge determines the defendant is indigent based on the defendant’s sworn statement or affidavit filed with the court. A court that requires reimbursement under this article may require the defendant to reimburse the county only for those days the defendant is confined after the date of conviction or on which a plea of guilty or nolo contendere was entered. The court may not require a defendant to reimburse the county for those days the defendant was confined after arrest and before the date of conviction or on which the plea of guilty or nolo contendere was entered.
(d) The court, in determining whether to order reimbursement under this article, shall consider: (1) the defendant’s employment status, earning ability, and financial resources; and (2) any other special circumstances that may affect the defendant’s ability to pay, including child support obligations and including any financial responsibilities owed by the defendant to dependents or restitution payments owed by the defendant to a victim. |
Misdemeanor |
The defendant’s employment status, earning ability, and financial resources; and any other special circumstances that may affect the defendant’s ability to pay, including child support obligations and including any financial responsibilities owed by the defendant to dependents or restitution payments owed by the defendant to a victim.
|
Before imposition of fine or fee | Burden on defendant to show inability to pay | Determined by judge without hearing | No |
May not require reimbursement. |
Add to Dashboard
|
Texas | Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Art. 42A.652(b) | Monthly Reimbursement Fee |
The judge may make payment of the monthly reimbursement fee a condition of granting or continuing the community supervision. The judge may waive or reduce the reimbursement fee or suspend a monthly payment of the fee if the judge determines that payment of the reimbursement fee would cause the defendant a significant financial hardship.
|
All |
"significant financial hardship" |
Before imposition of fine or fee | Not provided for | Determined by judge without hearing | No |
Waive or reduce the reimbursement fee or suspend a monthly payment of the fee |
The Criminal Justice Debt Reform Builder is a project of the National Criminal Justice Debt Initiative of the Criminal Justice Policy Program at Harvard Law School in collaboration with the Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society at Harvard University and with user experience design by metaLAB (at) Harvard.
For more information, please visit cjpp.law.harvard.edu.