50-State Criminal Justice Debt Reform Builder Bringing transparency to areas of significant legal complexity.
Ability to Pay
Keyword search across all of the laws in the states. Subject-area tabs above allow you to narrow results. Click the advanced search for further refinement.
Every law can be saved to the Reform Builder
See all ability to pay policy recommendations in CJPP’s Policy Guide
State
- Alabama (12)
- Alaska (8)
- Arizona (5)
- Arkansas (8)
- California (90)
- Colorado (29)
- Connecticut (19)
- Delaware (4)
- Florida (36)
- Georgia (14)
- Hawaii (14)
- Idaho (15)
- Illinois (23)
- Indiana (15)
- Iowa (12)
- Kansas (6)
- Kentucky (17)
- Louisiana (10)
- Maine (9)
- Maryland (3)
- Massachusetts (39)
- Michigan (17)
- Minnesota (14)
- Mississippi (8)
- Missouri (15)
- Montana (29)
- Nebraska (14)
- (-) Nevada (7)
- New Hampshire (29)
- New Jersey (9)
- New Mexico (14)
- New York (8)
- North Carolina (14)
- North Dakota (14)
- Ohio (32)
- Oklahoma (10)
- Oregon (13)
- Pennsylvania (6)
- Rhode Island (3)
- South Carolina (17)
- South Dakota (10)
- Tennessee (11)
- (-) Texas (17)
- Utah (5)
- Vermont (9)
- Virginia (10)
- Washington (15)
- Washington DC (5)
- West Virginia (16)
- Wisconsin (7)
- Wyoming (17)
Keyword search
Reset
Reset all filtersTimeline
Burden of proof
Method of determination
Narrrow results
Level of Offense
Below are the ability to pay laws that meet your search criteria. Many include a See related provisions prompt which searches our database for laws that may pertain to your result.
24 Results
| State | Statute | Description/Statute Name | Statutory language | Level of offense | Definition of ability to pay | Timeline | Burden of proof | Method of determination | Mandatory | Remedies if unable to pay | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Add to Dashboard
|
Nevada | Nev. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 176.085 | Reduction of excessive fine or administrative assessment; payment in installments. |
Whenever, after a fine and administrative assessment have been imposed but before they have been discharged by payment or confinement, it is made to appear to the judge or justice + See moreimposing the fine or administrative assessment or his or her successor: 1. That the fine or administrative assessment is excessive in relation to the financial resources of the defendant, the judge or justice or his or her successor may reduce the fine accordingly.
2. That the discharge of the fine or administrative assessment is not within the defendant’s present financial ability to pay, the judge or justice or his or her successor may direct that the fine be paid in installments.
|
All |
excessive in relation to the financial resources of the defendant; not withiin the defendant's present financial ability to pay |
At enforcement of fine or fee | Not provided for | Not provided for | No |
Installment plan |
|
Add to Dashboard
|
Nevada | Nev. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 484C.515 (2) | Fee for specialty court programs |
If the fee pursuant to subsection 1: (a) Is not within the defendant’s present ability to pay, the justice or judge may include in the sentence, + See morein addition to any other penalty or administrative assessment provided by law, community service for a reasonable number of hours, the value of which would be commensurate with the fee.
(b) Is not entirely within the defendant’s present ability to pay, the justice or judge may include in the sentence, in addition to any other penalty or administrative assessment provided by law, a reduced fee and community service for a reasonable number of hours, the value of which would be commensurate with the amount of the reduction of the fee.
|
Misdemeanor |
not within the defendant’s present ability to pay; not entirely within the defendant's present ability to pay |
Not provided for | Not provided for | Not provided for | No |
community service; reduced fee |
|
Add to Dashboard
|
Nevada | Nev. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 209.4295 (2)-(3) | Payment of cost of supervision and treatment; performance of community service as contribution toward cost; issuance of judgment for unpaid costs |
2. A court shall not refuse to place a probation violator in the diversion program if the probation violator does not have the financial resources to pay any or all of + See morethe related costs. 3. The court may order a probation violator who is placed in the diversion program to perform a specified amount of community service upon release from the program to contribute toward the cost of his or her treatment and supervision. Any such community service must be performed for and under the supervising authority of a county, city, town or other political subdivision or agency of the State of Nevada or a charitable organization that renders service to the community or its residents.
|
All |
violator does not have the financial resources to pay any or all of the related costs |
Not provided for | Not provided for | Not provided for | Yes |
community service |
|
Add to Dashboard
|
Nevada | Nev. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 211A.130 (3) | Fees for cost of supervision: Imposition; waiver or reduction |
3. If the chief determines that payment of the fee would result in economic hardship to a probationer or a supervised releasee, the chief may waive the imposition of, or reduce + See morethe amount of, the fee. If the chief waives the imposition of the fee, payment of the fee by the probationer or the supervised releasee does not constitute a condition of his or her suspended sentence, residential confinement or pretrial or presentence release.
|
All |
economic hardship |
Not provided for | Not provided for | Not provided for | No |
reduction or waiver of fee |
|
Add to Dashboard
|
Nevada | Nev. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 213.1076 (2) | Fee to defray costs of supervision; regulations; waiver |
2. The Chief may waive the fee to defray the cost of supervision, in whole or in part, if the Chief determines that payment of the fee would create an economic + See morehardship on the parolee, probationer or person supervised by the Division through residential confinement.
|
All |
economic hardship |
Not provided for | Not provided for | Not provided for | No |
reduction or waiver of fee |
|
Add to Dashboard
|
Nevada | Nev. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 209.4886 (4) | Participation in judicial program: Referral of offender to reentry court; powers and duties of Director; regulations; reimbursement of costs; effect of violation of terms and conditions; status of offender |
The Director shall adopt regulations requiring offenders who are assigned to the custody of the Division pursuant to this section to reimburse the reentry court, the Division and the Department + See morefor the cost of their participation in a judicial program, to the extent of their ability to pay.
|
All | Not provided for | Not provided for | Not provided for | Not provided for | Yes | Not provided for |
|
Add to Dashboard
|
Nevada | Nev. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 176.139 (7) | Presentence investigation and report: Psychosexual evaluation of certain sex offenders required; standards and methods for conducting evaluation; access to records; rights of confidentiality and privileges deemed waived; costs |
If a psychosexual evaluation is conducted pursuant to this section, the court shall: (a) Order the defendant, to the extent of the defendant’s financial ability, to + See morepay for the cost of the psychosexual evaluation; or
(b) If the defendant was less than 18 years of age when the sexual offense was committed and the defendant was certified and convicted as an adult, order the parents or guardians of the defendant, to the extent of their financial ability, to pay for the cost of the psychosexual evaluation. For the purposes of this paragraph, the court has jurisdiction over the parents or guardians of the defendant to the extent that is necessary to carry out the provisions of this paragraph.
|
All | Not provided for | Not provided for | Not provided for | Not provided for | Yes | Not provided for |
|
Add to Dashboard
|
Texas | Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Art. 37.073 | Repayment of Rewards |
(a) After a defendant has been convicted of a felony offense, the judge may order a defendant to pay a fine repaying all or part of a reward paid by a crime stoppers organization.
(b) In determining whether the defendant must repay the reward or part of the reward, the court shall consider: (1) the ability of the defendant to make the payment and the financial hardship on the defendant to make the required payment; and (2) the importance of the information to the prosecution of the defendant as provided by the arresting officer or the attorney for the state with due regard for the confidentiality of the crime stoppers organization records. |
Felony |
Not provided for |
Before imposition of fine or fee | Not provided for | Other | Yes |
Nonpayment or partial payment/ |
|
Add to Dashboard
|
Texas | Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Art. 42A.452 | Treatment, Specialized Supervision, or Rehabilitation |
On a finding that the defendant is financially able to make payment, the judge shall require the defendant to pay a reimbursement fee for all or part of the reasonable and necessary costs of the treatment, supervision, or rehabilitation.
|
Felony |
Not provided for |
Before imposition of fine or fee | Not provided for | Not provided for | Yes |
None specified |
|
Add to Dashboard
|
Texas | Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Art. 42A.408(f) | Use of Ignition Interlock Device |
If the court determines the defendant is unable to pay for the ignition interlock device, the court may impose a reasonable payment schedule not to exceed twice the length of the period of the court’s order.
|
All |
Not provided for |
Before imposition of fine or fee | Not provided for | Not provided for | No |
Reasonable payment schedule |
|
Add to Dashboard
|
Texas | Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Art. 42A.303(f) | Substance Abuse Felony Program |
In establishing the amount of a fee under Subsection (d)(2), the judge shall consider fines, fees, and other necessary expenses for which the defendant is obligated. The judge may not: (1) establish the fee in an amount that is greater than 25 percent of the defendant's gross income while the defendant is a participant in residential aftercare; or (2) require the defendant to pay the fee at any time other than a time at which the defendant is both employed and a participant in residential aftercare.
|
All |
N/A |
Before imposition of fine or fee | Not provided for | Determined by judge without hearing | Yes |
N/A |
|
Add to Dashboard
|
Texas | Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Art. 102.020(j) | Costs Related to DNA Testing [Repealed Effective January 1, 2020] |
The court may waive the imposition of a court cost under this article if the court determines that the defendant is indigent and unable to pay the cost. |
All |
Indigent and unable to pay the cost |
Before imposition of fine or fee | Not provided for | Not provided for | No |
Not provided for |
|
Add to Dashboard
|
Texas | Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Art. 102.018(b) | Reimbursement Fees and Expenses Attendant to Intoxication Convictions |
Except as provided by Subsection (d), on conviction of an offense relating to the driving or operating of a motor vehicle punishable under Section 49.04(b), Penal Code, the court shall impose as a reimbursement fee on the defendant an amount that is equal to the reimbursement fee of an evaluation of the defendant performed under Article 42A.402(a). Reimbursement fees imposed under this subsection are in addition to other court costs and are due whether or not the defendant is granted community supervision in the case, except that if the court determines that the defendant is indigent and unable to pay the fee, the court may waive the imposition of the fee
|
All |
Indigent |
Before imposition of fine or fee | Not provided for | Not provided for | No |
Fee waiver |
|
Add to Dashboard
|
Texas | Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Art. 43.03(c) | Payment of Fine |
A court may not order a defendant confined under Subsection (a) of this article unless the court at a hearing makes a written determination that:(1) the defendant is not indigent and has failed to make a good faith effort to discharge the fines and costs; or (2) the defendant is indigent and: (A) has failed to make a good faith effort to discharge the fines and costs under Article 43.09(f); and (B) could have discharged the fines and costs under Article 43.09 without experiencing any undue hardship.
|
All |
For the purpose of establishing a right to representation by counsel, “indigent” means a person who is not financially able to employ counsel: Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 1.051. |
At enforcement of fine or fee | Not provided for | Determined by judge after hearing | Yes |
None specified |
|
Add to Dashboard
|
Texas | Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Art. 42A.751(i) | Violation of Conditions of Community Supervision; Detention and Hearing |
(i) In a revocation hearing at which it is alleged only that the defendant violated the conditions of community supervision by failing to pay compensation paid to appointed counsel, community supervision fees, or court costs, the state must prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the defendant was able to pay and did not pay as ordered by the judge.
|
All |
Not provided for |
At enforcement of fine or fee | Burden on government to show ability to pay | Determined by judge after hearing | Yes |
None specified |
|
Add to Dashboard
|
Texas | Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Art. 26.05(g) | Compensation of Counsel Appointed to Defend |
If the judge determines that a defendant has financial resources that enable the defendant to offset in part or in whole the costs of the legal services provided to the defendant in accordance with Article 1.051(c) or (d), including any expenses and costs, the judge shall order the defendant to pay during the pendency of the charges or, if convicted, as a reimbursement fee the amount that the judge finds the defendant is able to pay.
|
All |
Not provided for |
Before imposition of fine or fee | Not provided for | Determined by judge without hearing | Yes |
Pay only attorney fee that defendant can afford to pay. |
|
Add to Dashboard
|
Texas | Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 42.038(c)-(d) | Reimbursement for Confinement Expenses |
(c) A judge may not require reimbursement under this article if the judge determines the defendant is indigent based on the defendant’s sworn statement or affidavit filed with the court. A court that requires reimbursement under this article may require the defendant to reimburse the county only for those days the defendant is confined after the date of conviction or on which a plea of guilty or nolo contendere was entered. The court may not require a defendant to reimburse the county for those days the defendant was confined after arrest and before the date of conviction or on which the plea of guilty or nolo contendere was entered.
(d) The court, in determining whether to order reimbursement under this article, shall consider: (1) the defendant’s employment status, earning ability, and financial resources; and (2) any other special circumstances that may affect the defendant’s ability to pay, including child support obligations and including any financial responsibilities owed by the defendant to dependents or restitution payments owed by the defendant to a victim. |
Misdemeanor |
The defendant’s employment status, earning ability, and financial resources; and any other special circumstances that may affect the defendant’s ability to pay, including child support obligations and including any financial responsibilities owed by the defendant to dependents or restitution payments owed by the defendant to a victim.
|
Before imposition of fine or fee | Burden on defendant to show inability to pay | Determined by judge without hearing | No |
May not require reimbursement. |
|
Add to Dashboard
|
Texas | Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Art. 42A.652(b) | Monthly Reimbursement Fee |
The judge may make payment of the monthly reimbursement fee a condition of granting or continuing the community supervision. The judge may waive or reduce the reimbursement fee or suspend a monthly payment of the fee if the judge determines that payment of the reimbursement fee would cause the defendant a significant financial hardship.
|
All |
"significant financial hardship" |
Before imposition of fine or fee | Not provided for | Determined by judge without hearing | No |
Waive or reduce the reimbursement fee or suspend a monthly payment of the fee |
|
Add to Dashboard
|
Texas | Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Art. 42.037(h) | Restitution |
(h) If a defendant is placed on community supervision or is paroled or released on mandatory supervision, the court or the parole panel shall order the payment of restitution ordered under this article as a condition of community supervision, parole, or mandatory supervision. The court may revoke community supervision and the parole panel may revoke parole or mandatory supervision if the defendant fails to comply with the order. In determining whether to revoke community supervision, parole, or mandatory supervision, the court or parole panel shall consider:
(1) the defendant’s employment status; (2) the defendant’s current and future earning ability; (3) the defendant’s current and future financial resources; (4) the willfulness of the defendant’s failure to pay; (5) any other special circumstances that may affect the defendant’s ability to pay; and (6) the victim’s financial resources or ability to pay expenses incurred by the victim as a result of the offense. |
All |
Consideration of the defendant’s employment status; the defendant’s current and future earning ability; the defendant’s current and future financial resources; the willfulness of the defendant’s failure to pay; any other special circumstances that may affect the defendant’s ability to pay; and the victim’s financial resources or ability to pay expenses incurred by the victim as a result of the offense.
|
At enforcement of fine or fee | Not provided for | Not provided for | No |
Will not revoke community supervision, parole, or mandatory supervision for failure to pay restitution as a condition. |
|
Add to Dashboard
|
Texas | Fines and Costs(a-1),(c) | Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Art. 42.15 |
(a-1) [2 Versions: As added by Acts 2017, 85th Leg., ch. 1127] Notwithstanding any other provision of this article, during or immediately after imposing a sentence in a case in which the defendant entered a plea in open court as provided by Article 27.13, 27.14(a), or 27.16(a), a court shall inquire whether the defendant has sufficient resources or income to immediately pay all or part of the fine and costs. If the court determines that the defendant does not have sufficient resources or income to immediately pay all or part of the fine and costs, the court shall determine whether the fine and costs should be:
(1) subject to Subsection (c), required to be paid at some later date or in a specified portion at designated intervals; (2) discharged by performing community service under, as applicable, Article 43.09(f), Article 45.049, Article 45.0492, as added by Chapter 227 (H.B. 350), Acts of the 82nd Legislature, Regular Session, 2011, or Article 45.0492, as added by Chapter 777 (H.B. 1964), Acts of the 82nd Legislature, Regular Session, 2011; (3) waived in full or in part under Article 43.091 or 45.0491; or (4) satisfied through any combination of methods under Subdivisions (1)—(3). (c) When imposing a fine and costs in a misdemeanor case, if the court determines that the defendant is unable to immediately pay the fine and costs, the court shall allow the defendant to pay the fine and costs in specified portions at designated intervals. |
All |
Sufficient resources or income to immediately pay all or part of the fine and costs |
Before imposition of fine or fee | Not provided for | Determined by judge without hearing | No |
Court may order payment (1) at some later date or in a specified portion at designated intervals, (2) discharged by performing community service, (3) waived in full or in part, or (4) satisfied through any combination of methods (case in which the defendant entered a plea); pay the fine and costs in specified portions at designated intervals (misdemeanor).
|
The Criminal Justice Debt Reform Builder is a project of the National Criminal Justice Debt Initiative of the Criminal Justice Policy Program at Harvard Law School in collaboration with the Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society at Harvard University and with user experience design by metaLAB (at) Harvard.
For more information, please visit cjpp.law.harvard.edu.