Keyword search across all of the laws in the states. Subject-area tabs above allow you to narrow results. Click the advanced search for further refinement.
Every law can be saved to the Reform Builder
See all ability to pay policy recommendations in CJPP’s Policy Guide
Below are the ability to pay laws that meet your search criteria. Many include a See related provisions prompt which searches our database for laws that may pertain to your result.
14 Results
State | Statute | Description/Statute Name | Statutory language | Level of offense | Definition of ability to pay | Timeline | Burden of proof | Method of determination | Mandatory | Remedies if unable to pay | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Add to Dashboard
|
Utah | Utah R. Crim. P. 15 | Expert Witnesses |
Upon showing that a defendant is financially unable to pay the fees of an expert whose services are necessary for adequate defense, the witness fee shall be paid as if + See morehe were called on behalf of the prosecution.
|
All |
unable to pay fees |
Before imposition of fine or fee | Burden on defendant to show inability to pay | Not provided for | No |
costs covered by state |
Add to Dashboard
|
Utah | Utah Code Ann. § 76-5-502 | Request for testing--Mandatory testing--Liability for costs | the alleged offender who is tested is responsible upon conviction for the costs of testing, unless the alleged offender is indigent. | All |
indigent |
Not provided for | Not provided for | Not provided for | Yes |
costs covered by state |
Add to Dashboard
|
Utah | Utah Code Ann. § 77-32a-3 | Ability to pay |
The court shall not include in the judgment a sentence that a defendant pay costs unless the defendant is or will be able to pay them. In determining the amount + See moreand method of payment of costs, the court shall take account of the financial resources of the defendant and the nature of the burden that payment of costs will impose and that restitution be the first priority
|
All | Not provided for | Before imposition of fine or fee | Not provided for | Not provided for | Yes | Not provided for |
Add to Dashboard
|
Utah | Utah Code Ann. § 76-3-201.1 | Collection of criminal judgments--reduce fines |
When a defendant defaults in the payment of a criminal judgment account receivable or any installment of that receivable, the court, on motion of the prosecution, victim, or upon its + See moreown motion may: (a) order the defendant to appear and show cause why the default should not be treated as contempt of court; or (b) issue a warrant of arrest... (5) If it appears to the satisfaction of the court that the default is not contempt, the court may enter an order for any of the following or any combination of the following...(f) except as limited by Subsection (6) [restitution] ... reduce or revoke the unpaid amount of the criminal judgment account receivable
|
All | Not provided for | At enforcement of fine or fee | Not provided for | Not provided for | No |
reduction or revocation of fine |
Add to Dashboard
|
Utah | Utah Code Ann. § 77-32-202(2)(a) | Procedure for determination of indigence--Standards |
Any defendant claiming indigence who is charged with a crime the penalty of which is a class A misdemeanor or serious offense shall file with the court a fully complete + See moreaffidavit verified by a notary or other person authorized by law to administer an oath and file a copy of that affidavit with the prosecuting entity. The affidavit shall contain the factual information required in this section and by the court. . . Indigence means that a person: (i) does not have sufficient income, assets, credit, or other means to provide for the payment of legal counsel and all other necessary expenses of representation without depriving that person or the family of that person of food, shelter, clothing, and other necessities; or (ii) has an income level at or below 150% of the United States poverty level as defined by the most recently revised poverty income guidelines published by the United States Department of Health and Human Services; and (iii) has not transferred or otherwise disposed of any assets since the commission of the offense with the intent of establishing eligibility for the appointment of counsel under this chapter.
|
All |
does not have sufficient income, assets, credit or other means to provide for payment of legal counsel and all other necessary expenses without depriving that person or the family of that person of basic necessities OR has income level at or below 150 percent of US poverty level and has not transferred or disposed of property since the commission of the offense
|
Not provided for | Not provided for | Not provided for | No |
cost of attorneys fees covered |
Add to Dashboard
|
Virginia | Va. Code Ann. § 19.2-355 | Petition of defendant |
(a) In determining whether the defendant is unable to pay such fine forthwith, the court may require such defendant to file a petition, under oath, with the court, upon a + See moreform provided by the court, setting forth the financial condition of the defendant.
(b) Such form shall be a questionnaire, and shall include, but shall not be limited to: the name and residence of the defendant; his occupation, if any; his family status and the number of persons dependent upon him; his monthly income; whether or not his dependents are employed and, if so, their approximate monthly income; his banking accounts, if any; real estate owned by the defendant, or any interest he may have in real estate; income produced therefrom; any independent income accruing to the defendant; tangible and intangible personal property owned by the defendant, or in which he may have an interest; and a statement listing the approximate indebtedness of the defendant to other persons. Such form shall also include a payment plan of the defendant, if the court should exercise its discretion in permitting the payment of such fine and costs in installments or other conditions to be fixed by the court.
|
All | Not provided for | Before imposition of fine or fee | Not provided for | Not provided for | No |
permitting the payment of such fine and costs in installments or other conditions to be fixed by the court |
Add to Dashboard
|
Virginia | Va. Code Ann. § 19.2-358(C) | Show cause hearing on default |
B. Following the order to show cause or following a capias issued for a defendant's failure to comply with a court order to appear issued pursuant to subsection A of + See more§ 19.2-354, unless the defendant shows that his default was not attributable to an intentional refusal to obey the sentence of the court, or not attributable to a failure on his part to make a good faith effort to obtain the necessary funds for payment, or unless the defendant shows that any failure to appear was not attributable to an intentional refusal to obey the order of the court, the court may order the defendant confined as for a contempt for a term not to exceed sixty days or impose a fine not to exceed $500. The court may provide in its order that payment or satisfaction of the amounts in default at any time will entitle the defendant to his release from such confinement or, after entering the order, may at any time reduce the sentence for good cause shown, including payment or satisfaction of such amounts.
C. If it appears that the default is excusable under the standards set forth in subsection B hereof, the court may enter an order allowing the defendant additional time for payment, reducing the amount due or of each installment, or remitting the unpaid portion in whole or in part.
|
All | Not provided for | At enforcement of fine or fee | Burden on defendant to show inability to pay | Determined by judge after hearing | No |
additional time for payment, reducing the amount due or of each installment, or remitting the unpaid portion in whole or in part |
Add to Dashboard
|
Virginia | Va. Code Ann. § 19.2-363 | Authority of Governor to grant relief from fines and penalties in case of deceased defendant |
provided, that when the party against whom the fine or penalty has been imposed and judgment rendered therefor has departed this life leaving a spouse or children surviving, the Governor + See moremay remit such fine or penalty upon the certificate of the judge of the circuit court of the county or city wherein such fine or penalty was imposed and judgment rendered, that to enforce the same against the estate, real or personal, of the decedent, would impose hardship upon the spouse or children
|
All |
would impose hardship upon the spouse or children |
At defendant's request at enforcement | Not provided for | Determined by judge after hearing | No |
remittance |
Add to Dashboard
|
Virginia | Va. Code Ann. § 19.2-299.2(C) | Local alcohol safety action program - ability to pay |
If the referral is to the local alcohol safety action program, the program may charge a fee for the education and intervention component, or both, not to exceed $300, based + See moreupon the defendant's ability to pay.
|
All | Not provided for | Not provided for | Not provided for | Not provided for | Yes |
Not specified |
Add to Dashboard
|
Virginia | Va. Code Ann. § 53.1-150.1 | Substance abuse treatment as condition of parole - exemptions |
Any person who is granted parole and who is required to receive substance abuse treatment as a condition of parole shall contribute towards the cost of such treatment based upon + See morehis ability to pay, as established pursuant to regulations promulgated by the Board of Corrections. The regulations shall provide that (i) any fees collected for such treatment shall be paid directly to the service provider and (ii) any person may be exempt from the payment of such fees on the grounds of unreasonable hardship.
|
All |
unreasonable hardship |
Before imposition of fine or fee | Not provided for | Administrative decision | Yes |
exemption from payment of fees |
Add to Dashboard
|
Virginia | Va. Code Ann. § 18.2-57.3(D) | Education/treatment program sliding scale fee structure |
The court shall require the person entering such education or treatment program or services under the provisions of this section to pay all or part of the costs of the + See moreprogram or services, including the costs of any assessment, evaluation, testing, education and treatment, based upon the person's ability to pay. Such programs or services shall offer a sliding-scale fee structure or other mechanism to assist participants who are unable to pay the full costs of the required programs or services.
|
All | Not provided for | Before imposition of fine or fee | Not provided for | Not provided for | Yes |
sliding scale fee structure |
Add to Dashboard
|
Virginia | Va. Code Ann. § 18.2-251 | Program costs - ability to pay |
The court shall require the person entering such program under the provisions of this section to pay all or part of the costs of the program, including the costs of + See morethe screening, assessment, testing, and treatment, based upon the accused's ability to pay unless the person is determined by the court to be indigent.
|
All |
Indigence |
Before imposition of fine or fee | Not provided for | Other | Yes |
exemption from payment of fees |
Add to Dashboard
|
Virginia | Va. Code Ann. § 18.2-258.1(H) | Program costs - indigency |
The court shall require the person entering such program under the provisions of this section to pay all or part of the costs of the program, including the costs of + See morethe screening, evaluation, testing and education, based upon the person's ability to pay unless the person is determined by the court to be indigent.
|
All |
Indigence |
Before imposition of fine or fee | Not provided for | Other | Yes |
exemption from payment of fees |
Add to Dashboard
|
Virginia | Va. Code Ann. § 18.2-271.1(B) | Waiver of fee - indigency | Upon a positive finding that the defendant is indigent, the court may reduce or waive the fee. | All |
Indigence |
Not provided for | Not provided for | Not provided for | No |
waiver of fee |
The Criminal Justice Debt Reform Builder is a project of the National Criminal Justice Debt Initiative of the Criminal Justice Policy Program at Harvard Law School in collaboration with the Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society at Harvard University and with user experience design by metaLAB (at) Harvard.
For more information, please visit cjpp.law.harvard.edu.