Keyword search across all of the laws in the states. Subject-area tabs above allow you to narrow results. Click the advanced search for further refinement.
Every law can be saved to the Reform Builder
See all ability to pay policy recommendations in CJPP’s Policy Guide
Below are the ability to pay laws that meet your search criteria. Many include a See related provisions prompt which searches our database for laws that may pertain to your result.
20 Results
State | Statute | Description/Statute Name | Statutory language | Level of offense | Definition of ability to pay | Timeline | Burden of proof | Method of determination | Mandatory | Remedies if unable to pay | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Add to Dashboard
|
Arizona | Ariz. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 13-804.01(B)(2) | Reimbursement of Incarceration Costs; Misdemeanors | B. The court may determine the amount of incarceration costs to be paid based on the following factors:2. The person's ability to pay part or all of the incarceration costs. | Misdemeanor | Not provided for | Before imposition of fine or fee | Not provided for | Not provided for | No |
A lower cost based upon the defendant's ability to pay. |
Add to Dashboard
|
Arizona | Ariz. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 13-914(E)(2) | Intensive probation; evaluation; sentence; criteria; limit; conditions |
Paying restitution and probation fees of not less than seventy-five dollars unless, after determining the inability of the offender to pay the fee, the court assesses a lesser fee. Probation + See morefees shall be deposited in the adult probation services fund established by § 12-267. Any amount assessed pursuant to this paragraph shall be used to supplement monies used for the salaries of adult probation and surveillance officers and for support of programs and services of the superior court adult probation departments.
|
All | Not provided for | Not provided for | Not provided for | Not provided for | No |
Lower restitution or fee based upon the defendant's ability to pay. |
Add to Dashboard
|
Arizona | Ariz. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 13-810(E) | Consequences of nonpayment of fines, surcharges, fees, assessments, restitution or incarceration costs |
(E)If the court finds that the defendant has wilfully failed to pay a fine, a surcharge, a fee, an assessment, restitution or incarceration costs or finds that the defendant has intentionally refused to make a good faith effort to obtain the monies required for the payment, the court shall find that the default constitutes contempt and may do any of the following:
1. Order the defendant incarcerated in the county jail until the fine, surcharge, fee, assessment, restitution or incarceration costs, or a specified part of the fine, surcharge, fee, assessment, restitution or incarceration costs, is paid. 2. Refer the defendant for revocation of probation, parole or community supervision as authorized by law. 3. Enter an order pursuant to section 13-812. The levy or execution for the collection of a fine, a surcharge, a fee, an assessment, restitution or incarceration costs does not discharge a defendant who is incarcerated for nonpayment of the fine, surcharge, fee, assessment, restitution or incarceration costs until the amount of the fine, surcharge, fee, assessment, restitution or incarceration costs is collected. 4. Order the defendant to perform community restitution. |
All | Not provided for | At enforcement of fine or fee | Not provided for | Not provided for | No |
Modified payment arrangements |
Add to Dashboard
|
Arizona | Ariz. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 13-824(A) | Community restitution in lieu off monetary obligation |
A. Notwithstanding any other law, if a monetary obligation is imposed on a defendant at sentencing and the court finds the defendant is unable to pay all or part of the monetary obligation, the court may order the defendant to perform community restitution in lieu of the payment for all or part of the monetary obligation. The amount of community restitution shall be equivalent to the amount of the monetary obligation by crediting any service performed at a rate of ten dollars per hour.
|
All | Not provided for | At enforcement of fine or fee | Not provided for | Not provided for | No |
Community Restitution |
Add to Dashboard
|
Arizona | Ariz. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 12-116.01(F) | Surcharges; remittance reports; fund deposits |
The judge may waive all or part of the civil penalty, fine, forfeiture and surcharge, except for mandatory civil penalties and fines, the payment of which would work a hardship on the persons convicted or adjudicated or on their immediate families. If a fine or civil penalty is mandatory, the judge may waive only all or part of the surcharges prescribed by subsections A, B and C of this section and § 12-116.02. If a fine or civil penalty is not mandatory and if a portion of the civil penalty, fine, forfeiture and surcharge is waived or suspended, the amount assessed must be divided according to the proportion that the civil penalty, fine, bail or bond and the surcharge represent of the total amount due.
|
All | Not provided for | Not provided for | Not provided for | Not provided for | No |
A lower cost fine or fee based upon the defendant's ability to pay. |
Add to Dashboard
|
Maine | Me. Rev. Stat. tit 17-A § 1807(6) | Conditions of probation |
The court shall attach as a condition of probation that the person pay, through the Department of Corrections, a supervision fee of between $10 and $50 per month, as determined by the court, for the term of probation. If the court does not set a supervision fee, the supervision fee is $10 per month. Notwithstanding the attachment of supervision fee conditions on more than one sentence, a person on probation on concurrent sentences is required to pay only one supervision fee. In determining whether to set an amount higher than $10 per month, the court shall take into account the financial resources of the person and the nature of the burden its payment imposes. A person may not be sentenced to imprisonment without probation solely for the reason the person is not able to pay the fee.
|
All |
financial resources and nature of burden |
Before imposition of fine or fee | Not provided for | Determined by judge without hearing | No |
may allow additional time |
Add to Dashboard
|
Maine | Me. Rev. Stat. tit 17-A §1807(7) | Conditions of probation |
7. Electronic monitoring and substance testing fees; determination of amount by court; failure to pay; use of fees. Upon the request of the Department of Corrections, the court shall attach as a condition of probation that the person pay, through the department, an electronic monitoring fee, a substance testing fee or both, as determined by the court, for the term of probation. In determining the amount of the fees, the court shall take into account the financial resources of the person and the nature of the burden the payment imposes. A person may not be sentenced to imprisonment without probation solely for the reason the person is not able to pay the fees.
|
All |
Financial resources and nature of burden |
Before imposition of fine or fee | Not provided for | Not provided for | Yes |
Reduced fine |
Add to Dashboard
|
Maine | Me. Rev. Stat. tit 17-A §1702 | Criteria for imposing sentencing alternative that includes fine |
1. Consideration of financial capacity to pay and financial burden. In determining the amount of a fine, unless the fine amount is mandatory, and in determining the method of payment of a fine, the court shall take into account the present and future financial capacity of the convicted person to pay the fine and the nature of the financial burden that payment of the fine will impose on the person or a dependent, if any, of the person.
2. Burden of proving financial hardship or incapacity to pay. A convicted person who asserts a present or future incapacity to pay a fine or asserts that the fine will cause an excessive financial hardship on the person or on a dependent of the person has the burden of proving the incapacity or excessive hardship by a preponderance of the evidence. On appeal of a sentencing alternative involving a fine, the person has the burden of demonstrating that the incapacity or excessive financial hardship was proven as a matter of law. |
All |
By preponderance of evidence that fine would cause excessive financial hardship on offender or dependent |
Before imposition of fine or fee | Burden on defendant to show inability to pay | Determined by judge after hearing | No | Not provided for |
Add to Dashboard
|
Maine | Me. Rev. Stat. tit 17-A §2005(2)(D) | Criteria for restitution |
D. When the amount and method of payment of monetary restitution or the performance of service restitution creates an excessive financial hardship on the offender or dependent of the offender. In making this determination, all relevant factors must be considered, including, but not limited to the following:(1) The number of the offender's dependents; (2) The minimum living expenses of the offender and the offender's dependents; (3) The special needs of the offender and the offender's dependents, including necessary travel expense to and from work; (4) The offender's present income and potential future earning capacity; and (5) The offender's resources, from whatever source.
|
All |
excessive financial hardship on offender or dependents |
Before imposition of fine or fee | Not provided for | Determined by judge after hearing | No | Not provided for |
Add to Dashboard
|
Maine | Me. Rev. Stat. tit 17-A §1751(1)-(2) | County jail reimbursement fee |
1. Assessment of reimbursement fee. When an individual is sentenced to incarceration in a county jail, the sentencing court shall consider and may assess as part of the sentence a jail reimbursement fee, referred to in this section as “the reimbursement fee,” to help defray the expenses of the individual's room and board.
2. Evidence. The court, in determining whether a reimbursement fee as set out in subsection 1 is to be assessed and in establishing the amount of that fee, shall consider evidence relevant to the individual's ability to pay that fee, including, but not limited to, the factors set forth in section 2005, subsection 2, paragraph D, subparagraphs (1) to (5). The court may not consider as evidence the following: A. Joint ownership, if any, that the individual may have in real property; B. Joint ownership, if any, that the individual may have in any assets, earnings or other sources of income; and C. The income, assets, earnings or other property, both real and personal, owned by the individual's spouse or family. |
All |
excessive financial hardship on offender or dependents |
Not provided for | Not provided for | Determined by judge after hearing | Yes | Not provided for |
Add to Dashboard
|
Maine | Me. Rev. Stat. tit 17-A §1854(2)(A) | Requirements of administrative release |
In determining the amount of the fee, the court shall take into account the financial resources of the person and the nature of the burden its payment imposes. |
All |
Financial resources and nature of burden |
Before imposition of fine or fee | Not provided for | Not provided for | No | Not provided for |
Add to Dashboard
|
Maine | Me. R. of Unified Crim. P. 44(b) | Right to and Assignment of Counsel |
(b) Determination of Indigency. The court shall determine whether a defendant has sufficient means with which to employ counsel and in making such determination may examine the defendant under oath concerning the defendant's financial resources. A defendant does not have sufficient means with which to employ counsel if the defendant's lack of resources effectively prevents the defendant from retaining the services of competent counsel. In making its determination the court shall consider the following factors: the defendant's income, the defendant's credit standing, the availability and convertibility of any assets owned by the defendant, the living expenses of the defendant and the defendant's dependents, the defendant's outstanding obligations, the financial resources of the defendant's parents if the defendant is an unemancipated minor residing with his or her parents, and the cost of retaining the services of competent counsel.
|
All |
sufficient means with which to employ counsel |
Before imposition of fine or fee | Not provided for | Determined by judge after hearing | Yes |
Court appointed counsel free of costs |
Add to Dashboard
|
Maine | Me. Rev. Stat. tit 17-A §1902(1) | Deferred disposition |
1. Authority of court to order deferment and impose requirements; administrative supervision fee. Following the acceptance of a plea of guilty for a crime for which a person is eligible for a deferred disposition under section 1901, the court may order sentencing deferred to a date certain or determinable and impose requirements upon the person, to be in effect during the period of deferment, considered by the court to be reasonable and appropriate to assist the person to lead a law-abiding life. The court-imposed deferment requirements must include a requirement that the person refrain from criminal conduct and may include a requirement that the person pay to the appropriate county an administrative supervision fee of not more than $50 per month, as determined by the court, for the term of the deferment. In determining the amount of the fee, the court shall take into account the financial resources of the person and the nature of the burden its payment imposes. In exchange for the deferred sentencing, the person shall abide by the court-imposed deferment requirements. Unless the court orders otherwise, the requirements are immediately in effect.
|
All |
The financial resources of the person and the nature of the burden its payment imposes. |
Before imposition of fine or fee | Not provided for | Determined by judge without hearing | No | Not provided for |
Add to Dashboard
|
Maine | Me. Rev. Stat. tit 17-A § 1607 | Prohibition against imprisonment based on incapacity to pay fine |
If a court finds that an individual has met the burden of proving incapacity to pay a fine pursuant to section 1702, subsection 2, the court may not impose a term of imprisonment or any other sentencing alternative involving imprisonment solely for the reason that the individual does not have the present or future capacity to pay the fine.
|
All |
Not provided for |
At enforcement of fine or fee | Burden on defendant to show inability to pay | Not provided for | No | Not provided for |
Add to Dashboard
|
Pennsylvania | Pa. R. Crim. P. 706 | Fines or Costs |
(A) A court shall not commit the defendant to prison for failure to pay a fine or costs unless it appears after hearing that the defendant is financially able + See moreto pay the fine or costs.
(B) When the court determines, after hearing, that the defendant is without the financial means to pay the fine or costs immediately or in a single remittance, the court may provide for payment of the fines or costs in such installments and over such period of time as it deems to be just and practicable, taking into account the financial resources of the defendant and the nature of the burden its payments will impose, as set forth in paragraph (D) below.
(C) The court, in determining the amount and method of payment of a fine or costs shall, insofar as is just and practicable, consider the burden upon the defendant by reason of the defendant’s financial means, including the defendant’s ability to make restitution or reparations.
(D) In cases in which the court has ordered payment of a fine or costs in installments, the defendant may request a rehearing on the payment schedule when the defendant is in default of a payment or when the defendant advises the court that such default is imminent. At such hearing, the burden shall be on the defendant to prove that his or her financial condition has deteriorated to the extent that the defendant is without the means to meet the payment schedule. Thereupon the court may extend or accelerate the payment schedule or leave it unaltered, as the court finds to be just and practicable under the circumstances of record. When there has been default and the court finds the defendant is not indigent, the court may impose imprisonment as provided by law for nonpayment.
|
All |
financial means to pay, taking account of financial resources and nature of burden |
Not provided for | Burden on defendant to show inability to pay | Not provided for | Yes |
Installment Plans |
Add to Dashboard
|
Pennsylvania | 42 Pa. Stat. Ann. § 9726 | Fine |
The court shall not sentence a defendant to pay a fine unless it appears of record that:(1) the defendant is or will be able to pay the fine; and(2) the + See morefine will not prevent the defendant from making restitution or reparation to the victim of the crime.(d) Financial resources.--In determining the amount and method of payment of a fine, the court shall take into account the financial resources of the defendant and the nature of the burden that its payment will impose.
|
All |
financial means to pay, taking account of financial resources and nature of burden |
Not provided for | Not provided for | Not provided for | Yes |
waiver of fine |
Add to Dashboard
|
Pennsylvania | 42 Pa. Stat. Ann. § 9730 | Payment of Court Costs, Restitution, and Fines |
If a defendant defaults in the payment of a fine, court costs or restitution after imposition of sentence, the issuing authority or a senior judge or senior magisterial district judge + See moreappointed by the president judge for the purposes of this section may conduct a hearing to determine whether the defendant is financially able to pay. . . If the issuing authority, senior judge or senior magisterial district judge determines that the defendant is without the financial means to pay the fine or costs immediately or in a single remittance, the issuing authority, senior judge or senior magisterial district judge may provide for payment in installments. In determining the appropriate installments, the issuing authority, senior judge or senior magisterial district judge shall consider the defendant's financial resources, the defendant's ability to make restitution and reparations and the nature of the burden the payment will impose on the defendant. If the defendant is in default of a payment or advises the issuing authority, senior judge or senior magisterial district judge that default is imminent, the issuing authority, senior judge or senior magisterial district judge may schedule a rehearing on the payment schedule. At the rehearing the defendant has the burden of proving changes of financial condition such that the defendant is without the means to meet the payment schedule. The issuing authority, senior judge or senior magisterial district judge may extend or accelerate the schedule, leave it unaltered or sentence the defendant to a period of community service as the issuing authority, senior judge or senior magisterial district judge finds to be just and practicable under the circumstances.
|
All |
financial means to pay, taking account of financial resources and nature of burden |
At enforcement of fine or fee | Burden on defendant to show inability to pay | Not provided for | No |
extension or acceleration of payment schedule; community service |
Add to Dashboard
|
Pennsylvania | 18 Pa. Stat. Ann. § 7508.1(b) | Substance Abuse Education and Demand Reduction Fund. |
Unless the court finds that undue hardship would result, a mandatory cost of $100, which shall be in addition to any other costs imposed pursuant to statutory authority, shall automatically + See morebe assessed on any individual convicted, adjudicated delinquent or granted Accelerated Rehabilitative Disposition or any individual who pleads guilty or nolo contendere for a violation of the act of April 14, 1972 (P.L. 233, No. 64)1, known as The Controlled Substance, Drug, Device and Cosmetic Act, or a violation of 75 Pa.C.S. § 3802 (relating to driving under influence of alcohol or controlled substance).
|
All | Not provided for | Not provided for | Not provided for | Not provided for | Yes |
not specified |
Add to Dashboard
|
Pennsylvania | 18 Pa. Stat. Ann. § 1106 | Restitution for injuries to person or property |
At the time of sentencing the court shall specify the amount and method of restitution. In determining the amount and method of restitution, the court: (i) Shall consider the extent + See moreof injury suffered by the victim, the victim's request for restitution as presented to the district attorney in accordance with paragraph (4) and such other matters as it deems appropriate. (ii) May order restitution in a lump sum, by monthly installments or according to such other schedule as it deems just. (iii) Shall not order incarceration of a defendant for failure to pay restitution if the failure results from the offender's inability to pay.
|
All | Not provided for | Not provided for | Not provided for | Not provided for | Yes |
payment plan |
Add to Dashboard
|
Pennsylvania | 18 Pa. Stat. Ann. § 11.1102 | Costs for offender supervision programs |
1) For offenders under supervision of a county probation department or the board as of August 14, 1991, the fee shall automatically become a part of the supervision conditions as + See moreif the court or board had imposed it unless the court or board makes a finding that the offender is presently unable to pay.(2) The court or board may make a finding that the offender is unable to pay based on any of the following factors: (i) The offender has diligently attempted but has been unable to obtain employment that provides the offender sufficient income to make such payments. (ii) The offender is a student in a school, a college, a university or a course of vocational or technical training designed to fit the student for gainful employment. (iii) The offender has an employment handicap as determined by an examination acceptable to or ordered by the court or board. (iv) The offender's age prevents employment. (v) The offender is responsible for the support of dependents, and the payment of the assessment constitutes an undue hardship on the offender.(vi) Other extenuating circumstances as determined by the court or board.
|
All |
1) For offenders under supervision of a county probation department or the board as of August 14, 1991, the fee shall automatically become a part of the supervision conditions as if the court or board had imposed it unless the court or board makes a finding that the offender is presently unable to pay.(2) The court or board may make a finding that the offender is unable to pay based on any of the following factors: (i) The offender has diligently attempted but has been unable to obtain employment that provides the offender sufficient income to make such payments. (ii) The offender is a student in a school, a college, a university or a course of vocational or technical training designed to fit the student for gainful employment. (iii) The offender has an employment handicap as determined by an examination acceptable to or ordered by the court or board. (iv) The offender's age prevents employment. (v) The offender is responsible for the support of dependents, and the payment of the assessment constitutes an undue hardship on the offender.(vi) Other extenuating circumstances as determined by the court or board.
|
Not provided for | Burden on defendant to show inability to pay | Not provided for | Yes | Not provided for |
The Criminal Justice Debt Reform Builder is a project of the National Criminal Justice Debt Initiative of the Criminal Justice Policy Program at Harvard Law School in collaboration with the Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society at Harvard University and with user experience design by metaLAB (at) Harvard.
For more information, please visit cjpp.law.harvard.edu.