Keyword search across all of the laws in the states. Subject-area tabs above allow you to narrow results. Click the advanced search for further refinement.
Every law can be saved to the Reform Builder
See all ability to pay policy recommendations in CJPP’s Policy Guide
Below are the ability to pay laws that meet your search criteria. Many include a See related provisions prompt which searches our database for laws that may pertain to your result.
27 Results
State | Statute | Description/Statute Name | Statutory language | Level of offense | Definition of ability to pay | Timeline | Burden of proof | Method of determination | Mandatory | Remedies if unable to pay | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Add to Dashboard
|
Delaware | 10 Del. C. §8603(a) | Nonpayment of Costs |
When a defendant who is required to pay the costs of defense defaults in the payment thereof or of any installment, the court on motion of the Attorney General or upon its own motion may require the defendant to show cause why the default should not be treated as contempt of court, and may issue a rule or order to show cause why such default should not be treated as contempt of court, and may take such further actions as the court determines to produce the defendant before the court.
|
All | Not provided for | At enforcement of fine or fee | Burden on defendant to show inability to pay | Determined by judge without hearing | No |
Additional Time for Payment; Reducing Payment or Installment Amount; Revoking Payment in Whole or Unpaid Part. |
Add to Dashboard
|
Delaware | 10 Del. C. §8603(d) | Nonpayment of Costs |
If it appears to the satisfaction of the court that the default in the payment of defense costs is not contempt, the court may enter an order allowing the defendant additional time for payment, reducing the amount thereof or of each installment, or revoking such payment or the unpaid portion thereof in whole or in part.
|
All | Not provided for | At enforcement of fine or fee | Burden on defendant to show inability to pay | Determined by judge without hearing | No |
Additional Time for Payment; Reducing Payment or Installment Amount; Revoking Payment in Whole or Unpaid Part. |
Add to Dashboard
|
Delaware | 10 Del. C. §8601(d) | Recoupment of Costs |
A defendant who has been required to pay the costs of defense and who is not in contumacious default in the payment thereof may at any time petition the court for remission of the payment of such costs, or of any unpaid portion thereof. If it appears to the satisfaction of the court that payment of the amount due will impose manifest hardship on the defendant or immediate family, the court may remit all or part of the amount due in costs, or modify the method of payment.
|
All |
"Will impose manifest hardship on the defendant or immediate family." |
At defendant's request at enforcement | Burden on defendant to show inability to pay | Determined by judge without hearing | No |
Remission of All or Part of Fee. |
Add to Dashboard
|
Delaware | 10 Del. C. § 8601(c) | Recoupment of Costs |
The court shall not require a defendant to pay the costs of defense unless the defendant is, or will be, able to pay them. In determining the amount and method of payment of such costs, the court shall take account of the financial resources of the defendant and the nature of the burden that payment of costs will impose.
|
All |
"The court shall take account of the financial resources of the defendant and the nature of the burden that payment of costs will impose." |
Before imposition of fine or fee | Not provided for | Determined by judge without hearing | Yes |
Defendant Not Required to Pay. |
Add to Dashboard
|
Mississippi | Miss. Code Ann. § 99-19-20 (2) | Fines; payment; indigent defendants; inability to work or unavailability of work |
The defendant shall not be imprisoned if the defendant is financially unable to pay a fine and so states to the court in writing, under oath, after sentence is pronounced, + See moreand the court so finds
|
All | Not provided for | At defendant's request at enforcement | Burden on defendant to show inability to pay | Other | Yes |
work for the county |
Add to Dashboard
|
Mississippi | Miss. Code Ann. § 99-5-38 (8) | community service |
The court may allow a defendant to perform community service in lieu of paying the costs required by subsection (2)(b) or (c) if the court determines that the defendant is + See moreindigent.
|
Felony |
indigence |
Not provided for | Not provided for | Not provided for | No |
community service |
Add to Dashboard
|
Mississippi | Miss. Code Ann. § 63-11-31 (7)(a) | Interlock Device Fund |
The Department of Public Safety shall promulgate rules and regulations for the use of monies in the Interlock Device Fund to offset the cost of device installation and operation by + See moreand court-ordered drug testing of indigent offenders.
|
Misdemeanor |
inadequate resources to pay; participation in public assistance programs |
Not provided for | Burden on government to show ability to pay | Administrative decision | Yes |
Interlock Device Fund |
Add to Dashboard
|
Mississippi | Miss. Code Ann. § 47-7-49 (1) | hardship waiver |
A hardship waiver may be granted by the sentencing court or the Department of Corrections. A hardship waiver may not be granted for a period of time exceeding ninety (90) + See moredays.
|
Misdemeanor |
inability to pay |
At defendant's request at enforcement | Not provided for | Not provided for | Yes |
hardship waiver |
Add to Dashboard
|
Mississippi | Miss. Code Ann. § 47-5-1007 (1)(a) | Waiver | The department may waive the monthly fee if the offender is a full-time student or is engaged in vocational training. | Misdemeanor |
full-time student |
Not provided for | Not provided for | Not provided for | Yes |
waiver |
Add to Dashboard
|
Mississippi | Miss. Code Ann. § 47-5-1007 (1)(b) | sliding scale | based on a sliding scale using the standard of need for each family that is used to calculate TANF benefits | Misdemeanor |
TANF benefits recipient |
Not provided for | Not provided for | Other | Yes |
sliding scale for payment |
Add to Dashboard
|
Mississippi | Miss. Code Ann. § 47-5-1013 (a) | waiver |
The sentencing judge may charge a program fee of less than Eighty-eight Dollars ($ 88.00) per month in cases of extreme financial hardship, when such judge determines that the offender's + See moreparticipation in the program would provide a benefit to his community.
|
Misdemeanor |
extreme financial hardship |
Not provided for | Not provided for | Not provided for | No |
lower fee |
Add to Dashboard
|
Mississippi | Miss. Code Ann. § 99-37-3(2) | Imposition and amount |
In determining whether to order restitution which may be complete, partial or nominal, the court shall take into account:(a) The financial resources of the defendant and the burden that payment + See moreof restitution will impose, with due regard to the other obligations of the defendant;
(b) The ability of the defendant to pay restitution on an installment basis or on other conditions to be fixed by the court; and
(c) The rehabilitative effect on the defendant of the payment of restitution and the method of payment.
|
All |
ability of defendant to pay on installment basis, financial resources of the defendant, burden of payment |
Before imposition of fine or fee | Not provided for | Not provided for | Yes |
installment plan, reduction of amount, or waiver |
Add to Dashboard
|
Missouri | Mo. Ann. Stat. § 557.011 | Authorized dispositions |
In the event a sentence of confinement is ordered executed, a court may order that an individual serve all or any portion of such sentence on electronic monitoring; except that all costs associated with the electronic monitoring shall be charged to the person on house arrest. If the judge finds the person unable to afford the costs associated with electronic monitoring, the judge may order that the person be placed on house arrest with electronic monitoring if the county commission agrees to pay the costs of such monitoring. If the person on house arrest is unable to afford the costs associated with electronic monitoring and the county commission does not agree to pay from the general revenue of the county the costs of such electronic monitoring, the judge shall not order that the person be placed on house arrest with electronic monitoring.
|
All |
Unable to afford costs |
Before imposition of fine or fee | Not provided for | Determined by judge without hearing | No |
Payment by county |
Add to Dashboard
|
Missouri | Mo. Ann. Stat. § 559.021(6) | Conditions of probation--compensation of victims--free work, public or charitable--defendant not an employee for workers’ compensation purposes--payment to county restitution fund, when |
A defendant who fails to make a payment to a county law enforcement restitution fund may not have his or her probation revoked solely for failing to make such payment unless the judge, after evidentiary hearing, makes a finding supported by a preponderance of the evidence that the defendant either willfully refused to make the payment or that the defendant willfully, intentionally, and purposefully failed to make sufficient bona fide efforts to acquire the resources to pay.
|
All |
Not provided for |
At enforcement of fine or fee | Burden on government to show ability to pay | Determined by judge after hearing | Yes |
Probation not revoked |
Add to Dashboard
|
Missouri | Mo. Ann. Stat. § 479.260(1) | Court costs and fees, judicial education fund, purpose, administration |
Municipalities by ordinance may provide for fees in an amount per case to be set pursuant to sections 488.010 to 488.020 for each municipal ordinance violation case filed before a municipal judge, and in the event a defendant pleads guilty or is found guilty, the judge may assess costs against the defendant except in those cases where the defendant is found by the judge to be indigent and unable to pay the costs.
|
All |
Indigent |
Before imposition of fine or fee | Not provided for | Determined by judge without hearing | Yes |
Fees not assessed. |
Add to Dashboard
|
Missouri | Mo. Ann. Stat. § 600.090(1) | Determination of ability to pay all or part of representation costs--lien for reasonable value of services, procedure--deposit of funds collected |
If a person is determined to be eligible for the services provided by the state public defender system and if, at the time such determination is made, he is able to provide a limited cash contribution toward the cost of his representation without imposing a substantial hardship upon himself or his dependents, such contribution shall be required as a condition of his representation by the state public defender system.
|
All |
Able to provide limited cash contribution without imposing substantial hardship upon himself or his dependents. |
Before imposition of fine or fee | Not provided for | Determined by judge without hearing | Yes |
Payment of total costs of representation |
Add to Dashboard
|
Missouri | Mo. Ann. Stat. § 558.008 | Revocation of a fine |
A defendant who has been sentenced to pay a fine may at any time petition the sentencing court for a revocation of a fine or any unpaid portion thereof. If it appears to the satisfaction of the court that the circumstances which warranted the imposition of the fine no longer exist or that it would otherwise be unjust to require payment of the fine, the court may revoke the fine or the unpaid portion in whole or in part or may modify the method of payment.
|
All |
Unjust to require payment |
At defendant's request at enforcement | Not provided for | Not provided for | No |
Revocation of fine |
Add to Dashboard
|
Missouri | Mo. Rev. Stat. § 479.260(2) | Court costs and fees, judicial education fund, purpose, administration |
In municipal ordinance violation cases which are filed in the associate circuit division of the circuit court, fees shall be assessed in each case in an amount to be set pursuant to sections 488.010 to 488.020. In the event a defendant pleads guilty or is found guilty, the judge shall assess costs against the defendant except in those cases where the defendant is found by the judge to be indigent and unable to pay the costs.
|
All |
Indigent and unable to pay the costs |
Before imposition of fine or fee | Not provided for | Not provided for | Yes |
Costs not assessed. |
Add to Dashboard
|
Missouri | Mo. Ann. Stat. § 558.004(1) | Imposition of fines |
In determining the amount and the method of payment of a fine, the court shall, insofar as practicable, proportion the fine to the burden that payment will impose in view of the financial resources of an individual. The court shall not sentence an offender to pay a fine in any amount which will prevent him or her from making restitution or reparation to the victim of the offense.
|
All |
Financial resources and burden caused by fine. |
Before imposition of fine or fee | Not provided for | Not provided for | Yes |
Fine proportional to defendant's resources |
Add to Dashboard
|
Missouri | Mo. Ann. Stat. § 600.086(3),(6) | Eligibility for representation, rules to establish--indigency, how determined, procedure, appeal--false statements, penalty--investigation authorized |
3. The determination of indigency of any person seeking the services of the state public defender system shall be made by the defender or anyone serving under him at any stage of the proceedings. Upon motion by either party, the court in which the case is pending shall have authority to determine whether the services of the public defender may be utilized by the defendant. Upon the courts finding that the defendant is not indigent, the public defender shall no longer represent the defendant. Any such person claiming indigency shall file with the court an affidavit which shall contain the factual information required by the commission under rules which may be established by the commission in determining indigency.
6. The burden shall lie on the accused or the defendant to convince the defender or the court of his eligibility to receive legal services, in any conference, hearing or question thereon. |
All |
Indigent |
Before imposition of fine or fee | Burden on defendant to show inability to pay | Determined by judge without hearing | No |
Representation by public defender |
The Criminal Justice Debt Reform Builder is a project of the National Criminal Justice Debt Initiative of the Criminal Justice Policy Program at Harvard Law School in collaboration with the Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society at Harvard University and with user experience design by metaLAB (at) Harvard.
For more information, please visit cjpp.law.harvard.edu.