Below are the attorney general opinions that meet your search criteria.

10 Results

Export results to Excel

State Citation Description/Statute Name Question Brief answer Language from the opinion When does the case apply?
BS-+-Light-Rounded-Square
Add to Dashboard

+ Create New

Idaho Guideline 2/15/1979 Guideline 2/15/1979 Can a sheriff collect fees owed to him directly from criminal defendants? No
...we strongly question whether a defendant could be assessedthe costs of making the arrest or transporting him as a prisoner. Assessing costs of serving subpoenas might be upheld if the defendant
+ See more
is not indigent. We do not question the power of the court to collect the statutory $7 .50 under * 3 1 -3201A ( b).
Fines and fees
BS-+-Light-Rounded-Square
Add to Dashboard

+ Create New

South Carolina S.C.A.G. Oct. 8, 2012 (informal opinion) Civil contempt
Are the same procedural protections that are required in criminal proceedings required in civil collection/contempt proceedings arising from criminal justice debt when those proceedings may result in incarceration? What if
+ See more
the proceedings may only result in additional fines or non-incarceration penalties?
No - the rationale for punishment based on contempt proceedings rather than criminal proceedings is different
The principal purpose of criminal contempt is punishment. In civil contempt, however, the contemnors "carry the keys of prison in their own pockets" as the contempt serves to secure "compliance
+ See more
with judicial decrees." 287 S.E.2d at 919. The Court concluded that "[t]he conditional nature of the imprisonment, based entirely upon appellant's refusal to pay respondent's expenses, justified the civil contempt proceeding without a jury trial.
Enforcement
BS-+-Light-Rounded-Square
Add to Dashboard

+ Create New

South Carolina S.C.A.G. July 15, 1996 (informal opinion) Setting fees Does allowing different municipalities to set their own indigency standards or fines/fees violate the equal protection afforded by the state’s constitution? Not answered as to indigency - however, municipalities cannot set their own fees not in accordance with State statutes
it is the opinion of this Office that all fee schedules used in the various counties based upon ordinances and special statutes are unconstitutional and that the only fee schedule
+ See more
available for the services enumerated is to be found under South Carolina Code Section 27-53 (1976) [replaced by Act No. 164 of 1979]
Fines and fees
BS-+-Light-Rounded-Square
Add to Dashboard

+ Create New

South Carolina Robert L. McCrudy, S.C.A.G. Dec. 14, 1999 (informal opinion) Collection by private vendor Which fines and/or fees may be collected by a private vendor? Collection of criminal fines and fees are the job of the magistrate
With respect to the physical collection and handling ofpublic monies such as fines, restitution, etc. such should be done exclusively by the court and its officers rather than by the
+ See more
company, in the absence of legislative authorization therefore.
Enforcement
BS-+-Light-Rounded-Square
Add to Dashboard

+ Create New

South Carolina 1987 S.C. Op. Att'y Gen. 255 (1987) Bearden Should ability to pay be considered when imposing fines or fees or only when collecting fines or fees? Not answered - however, cannot implement a surcharge if defendant fails to pay fee
In the circumstances where an indigent fails to comply with the schedule of payments established by the court and the court determines that the indigent has wilfully refused to pay
+ See more
or failed to make bona fide efforts to pay, the court is authorized to imprison the defendant for contempt. As provided in Section 17–25–350, where part of the fine has been paid, the imprisonment cannot exceed the remaining pro rata portion of the sentence. I am unaware of any basis for a court to impose a fine in addition to the sentence originally imposed.
Ability to pay
BS-+-Light-Rounded-Square
Add to Dashboard

+ Create New

South Carolina 1978 S.C. Op. Att'y Gen. 140 (1978) South Carolina-Attorney General opinion What authority do county or municipal courts have to set fines or fees? By implication, they may set fees at least as far as reimbursement for public defense
Since the Defense of Indigents Act, supra, does not prohibit the municipal court from ordering reimbursement as a condition of suspended sentences and since such orders are not generally unconstitutional
+ See more
or improper, it is the opinion of this Office that certain municipal courts may order as a condition of a suspended sentence, a convicted indigent defendant to reimburse the Judicial Department for the costs of his representation by a public defender, pursuant to Section 17–3–40 of the Code of Laws.
BS-+-Light-Rounded-Square
Add to Dashboard

+ Create New

Texas
Tex. Att'y Gen Opinion Op. No. JM-10 (1983),"""Inability to pay fees is an affirmative defense to the failure to pay them.""",ability to pay,,transparencyShould ability to pay be considered when imposing
+ See more
fines or fees or only when collecting fines or fees?,,,,,,fines What authority do county or municipal courts have to set fines or fees?,Municipal courts have authority to sets fines and fees so long as they do not exceed the maximum fine or fee permitted by the relevant statute. ,Tex. Att'y Gen. Op. GA-0593 (2008)
court may impose . . . an increase in the defendant's fine, up to a total fine that does not exceed the maximum fine for the offense for which the
+ See more
defendant was sentenced
Who has the burden of proof in an ability to pay determination? What is the standard of proof required? Burden of proof is on the defendant by preponderance of the evidence. But see Rusk v. State, 440 S.W.3d 694, 702 (Tex. App. 2013) fines and fees
BS-+-Light-Rounded-Square
Add to Dashboard

+ Create New

Texas
Tex. Att'y Gen. Op. JM-176 (1984),"""Proceedings in contempt cases should proceed as near as practical to criminal cases.""",ability to pay,,enforcementDoes allowing different municipalities to set their own indigency standards or
+ See more
fines/fees violate the equal protection afforded by the state’s constitution? ,"Possibly. In Texas, a law that fixes a greater punishment in one county than another is violative of Equal Protection, so a law allowing for different levels of protection or different penalty fines may also violate Equal Protection. ",Tex. Att'y Gen. Op. DM-123 (1992); Tex. Att'y Gen. Op. JM-1120 (1989),"""costs imposed in misdemeanor cases involving state criminal statutes must be uniform statewide . . . a law that fixes a greater punishment in one county than in other counties for the violation of a state law cannot be upheld and is in contravention of constitutional inhibitions, both State and Federal""; ""Assessment of a minimum $50 fine in every Class C misdemeanor hot check case in order to defray the cost of an additional employee would result in the penalty for a state defined crime to be different in Jim Wells County than it is in other counties and would violate both due process and equal protection constitutional rights.""",fines and fees,,ability to pay Which fines and/or fees may be collected by a private vendor? ,Any fines or fees ordered to be paid by a court,Tex. Att'y Gen. Op. JC-0516 (2002)
The debts that may be collected [are] those which have been ordered to be paid by a court.
Are the same procedural protections that are required in criminal proceedings required in civil collection/contempt proceedings arising from criminal justice debt when those proceedings may result in incarceration? What if
+ See more
the proceedings may only result in additional fines or non-incarceration penalties?
Contempt case require the same or as near as practicable due process protections as criminal cases. revenue flow
BS-+-Light-Rounded-Square
Add to Dashboard

+ Create New

Texas Tex. Att'y Gen. Op. JC-0516 (2002) "The debts that may be collected [are] those which have been ordered to be paid by a court." Which fines and/or fees may be collected by a private vendor? Any fines or fees ordered to be paid by a court revenue flow
BS-+-Light-Rounded-Square
Add to Dashboard

+ Create New

Texas Tex. Att'y Gen Opinion Op. No. JM-10 (1983) "Inability to pay fees is an affirmative defense to the failure to pay them." Who has the burden of proof in an ability to pay determination? What is the standard of proof required? Burden of proof is on the defendant by preponderance of the evidence. But see Rusk v. State, 440 S.W.3d 694, 702 (Tex. App. 2013) ability to pay