50-State Criminal Justice Debt Reform Builder Bringing transparency to areas of significant legal complexity.
Poverty Penalties and Poverty Traps
Keyword search across all of the laws in the states. Subject-area tabs above allow you to narrow results. Click the advanced search for further refinement.
Every law can be saved to the Reform Builder
See all poverty penalty and poverty trap policy recommendations in CJPP’s Policy Guide
State
- Alabama (0)
- Alaska (4)
- (-) Arizona (6)
- Arkansas (6)
- California (0)
- Colorado (3)
- Connecticut (7)
- Delaware (2)
- Florida (13)
- Georgia (2)
- Hawaii (2)
- Idaho (1)
- Illinois (1)
- Indiana (4)
- Iowa (1)
- Kansas (1)
- (-) Kentucky (1)
- Louisiana (2)
- Maine (0)
- Maryland (1)
- Massachusetts (2)
- Michigan (4)
- Minnesota (0)
- Mississippi (0)
- Missouri (4)
- Montana (3)
- Nebraska (1)
- Nevada (1)
- New Hampshire (1)
- New Jersey (1)
- New Mexico (3)
- New York (3)
- North Carolina (2)
- North Dakota (5)
- Ohio (7)
- Oklahoma (1)
- Oregon (3)
- (-) Pennsylvania (1)
- Rhode Island (3)
- South Carolina (10)
- South Dakota (1)
- (-) Tennessee (1)
- Texas (2)
- Utah (6)
- Vermont (3)
- Virginia (3)
- Washington (2)
- Washington DC (2)
- West Virginia (1)
- Wisconsin (0)
- Wyoming (4)
Keyword search
Reset
Reset all filtersType of poverty penalty or poverty trap
- (-) Civil judgment (1)
- Collection fee/interest (5)
- Community service (3)
- Condition or extension of supervision (4)
- Driver's license suspension/impoundment (6)
- Extension of probation/supervision (0)
- Incarceration (13)
- Increased fine (4)
- Other (4)
- Payment plan/installment plan (10)
- (-) Property liens (8)
- Wage/bank account garnishment (5)
- Work program/jail industry program (3)
Narrrow results
Level of Offense
Below are the poverty penalties and poverty traps that meet your search criteria. Many include a See related provisions prompt which searches our database for laws that may pertain to your result.
9 Results
| State | Statute | Description/Statute Name | Statutory language | Type of poverty penalty or poverty trap | Level of offense | Mandatory | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Add to Dashboard
|
Arizona | Ariz. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 13-802(E) | Fines for misdemeanors |
A judgment that the defendant shall pay a fine, with or without the alternative of imprisonment, shall constitute a lien in like manner as a judgment for money rendered in a civil action.
|
Property liens | Misdemeanor | Yes |
|
Add to Dashboard
|
Arizona | Ariz. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 13-804(L) | Restitution for offense causing economic loss; fine for reimbursement of public monies; notification of arrearage; review hearing |
Notwithstanding any other law, a restitution lien is created in favor of a victim of the defendant ordered to make restitution. Monies received monthly from the defendant shall be applied first to satisfy the restitution order entered by the court and the payment of any restitution in arrears. Any monies that are owed by this state to a person who is under a restitution order shall be assigned first to discharge the restitution order, including any tax refund that is owed to the defendant.
|
Property liens | All | Yes |
|
Add to Dashboard
|
Arizona | Ariz. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 13-810(D)(3) | Consequences of nonpayment of fines, surcharges, fees, assessments, restitution or incarceration costs |
3. Enter an order pursuant to section 13-812. The levy or execution for the collection of a fine, a surcharge, a fee, an assessment, restitution or incarceration costs does not discharge a defendant who is incarcerated for nonpayment of the fine, surcharge, fee, assessment, restitution or incarceration costs until the amount of the fine, surcharge, fee, assessment, restitution or incarceration costs is collected.
|
Property liens | All | No |
|
Add to Dashboard
|
Arizona | Ariz. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 13-801(B) | Fines for felonies |
A judgment that the defendant shall pay a fine, with or without the alternative of imprisonment, shall constitute a lien in like manner as a judgment for money rendered in a civil action.
|
Property liens | Felony | No |
|
Add to Dashboard
|
Arizona | Ariz. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 13-806 | Restitution Lien |
A. The state or any person entitled to restitution pursuant to a court order may file inaccordance with this section a restitution lien. A filing fee, recording fee or any other charge is not required for filing a restitution lien.
|
Property liens | All | No |
|
Add to Dashboard
|
Arizona | Ariz. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 22-429(C) | Judgment; imprisonment for fine; limitation; lien |
A sentence that the defendant pay a fine, with or without the alternative of imprisonment, shall constitute a lien in like manner as a judgment for money rendered in a civil action.
|
Property liens | All | Yes |
|
Add to Dashboard
|
Kentucky | Ky. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 441.265(3),(5)-(7) | Required reimbursement by prisoner of costs of confinement; local policy of fee and expense rates; billing and collection methods |
(3) The jailer or his designee may bill and attempt to collect any amount owed which remains unpaid. The governing body of the county may, upon the advice of the jailer, contract with one (1) or more public agencies or private vendors to perform this billing and collection. Within twelve (12) months after the date of the prisoner's release from confinement, the county attorney, jailer, or the jailer's designee, may file a civil action to seek reimbursement from that prisoner for any amount owed which remains unpaid . . .
(6) Payment of any required fees may be automatically deducted from the prisoner's property or canteen account. If the prisoner has no funds in his account, a deduction may be made creating a negative balance. If funds become available or if the prisoner reenters the jail at a later date, the fees may be deducted from the prisoner's property or canteen account. (7) Prior to the prisoner's release, the jailer or his designee may work with the confined prisoner to create a reimbursement plan to be implemented upon the prisoner's release. At the end of the prisoner's incarceration, the prisoner shall be presented with a billing statement produced by the jailer or designee. After the prisoner's release, the jailer or his designee may, after negotiation with the prisoner, release the prisoner from all or part of the prisoner's repayment obligation if the jailer believes that the prisoner will be unable to pay the full amount due. |
Civil judgment | All | No |
|
Add to Dashboard
|
Pennsylvania | 42 Pa. Stat. Ann. § 9728(e)(1) | Preservation of assets - restitution |
Upon the filing of a criminal complaint, information or indictment charging a criminal violation or a petition alleging delinquency for which restitution may be ordered and alleging that the property + See morewith respect to which the order is sought appears to be necessary to satisfy such restitution order and judgment
|
Property liens | All | No |
|
Add to Dashboard
|
Tennessee | Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-24-105(a) | Collection; fines, costs and litigation taxes; license revocation |
Unless discharged by payment or service of imprisonment in default of a fine, a fine may be collected in the same manner as a judgment in a civil action. The + See moretrial court may also enforce all orders assessing any fine remaining in default by contempt upon a finding by the court that the defendant has the present ability to pay the fine and willfully refuses to pay. Costs and litigation taxes due may be collected in the same manner as a judgment in a civil action, but shall not be deemed part of the penalty, and no person shall be imprisoned under this section in default of payment of costs or litigation taxes. The following shall be the allocation formula for moneys paid into court: the first moneys paid in any case shall first be credited toward payment of litigation taxes and once litigation taxes have been paid, the next moneys shall be credited toward payment of costs; then additional moneys shall be credited toward payment of the fine.
|
Property liens | All | No |
The Criminal Justice Debt Reform Builder is a project of the National Criminal Justice Debt Initiative of the Criminal Justice Policy Program at Harvard Law School in collaboration with the Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society at Harvard University and with user experience design by metaLAB (at) Harvard.
For more information, please visit cjpp.law.harvard.edu.