50-State Criminal Justice Debt Reform Builder Bringing transparency to areas of significant legal complexity.
Poverty Penalties and Poverty Traps
Keyword search across all of the laws in the states. Subject-area tabs above allow you to narrow results. Click the advanced search for further refinement.
Every law can be saved to the Reform Builder
See all poverty penalty and poverty trap policy recommendations in CJPP’s Policy Guide
State
- Alabama (0)
- Alaska (3)
- (-) Arizona (2)
- Arkansas (3)
- California (5)
- Colorado (1)
- Connecticut (1)
- Delaware (2)
- Florida (9)
- Georgia (0)
- Hawaii (0)
- Idaho (1)
- Illinois (1)
- Indiana (0)
- Iowa (1)
- Kansas (2)
- Kentucky (2)
- Louisiana (2)
- (-) Maine (2)
- Maryland (1)
- Massachusetts (0)
- Michigan (4)
- Minnesota (1)
- Mississippi (2)
- Missouri (2)
- Montana (1)
- Nebraska (1)
- Nevada (2)
- New Hampshire (5)
- New Jersey (3)
- New Mexico (2)
- New York (1)
- North Carolina (3)
- (-) North Dakota (3)
- Ohio (5)
- Oklahoma (2)
- Oregon (4)
- Pennsylvania (4)
- Rhode Island (0)
- South Carolina (5)
- South Dakota (3)
- Tennessee (2)
- Texas (2)
- Utah (2)
- Vermont (0)
- Virginia (2)
- Washington (12)
- Washington DC (0)
- West Virginia (1)
- Wisconsin (2)
- Wyoming (5)
Keyword search
Reset
Reset all filtersType of poverty penalty or poverty trap
- Civil judgment (0)
- Collection fee/interest (1)
- Community service (2)
- Condition or extension of supervision (8)
- Driver's license suspension/impoundment (3)
- Extension of probation/supervision (0)
- Incarceration (14)
- Increased fine (4)
- Other (6)
- (-) Payment plan/installment plan (7)
- Property liens (11)
- Wage/bank account garnishment (4)
- Work program/jail industry program (1)
Narrrow results
Level of Offense
Below are the poverty penalties and poverty traps that meet your search criteria. Many include a See related provisions prompt which searches our database for laws that may pertain to your result.
7 Results
| State | Statute | Description/Statute Name | Statutory language | Type of poverty penalty or poverty trap | Level of offense | Mandatory | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Add to Dashboard
|
Arizona | Ariz. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 13-804(M) | Restitution for offense causing economic loss; fine for reimbursement of public monies; notification of arrearage; review hearing |
If the defendant, the state or persons entitled to restitution pursuant to a court order disagree with the manner of payment established in subsection E of this section, the defendant, court or person entitled to restitution may petition the court at any time to change the manner in which the restitution is paid. Before modifying the order pertaining to the manner in which the restitution is paid, the court shall give notice and an opportunity to be heard to the defendant, the state and, on request, persons entitled to restitution pursuant to a court order.
|
Payment plan/installment plan | All | No |
|
Add to Dashboard
|
Arizona | Ariz. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 13-808(A) | Time and method of payment of fine; conditions of probation; no limitation on restitution and other assessments |
If a defendant is sentenced to pay a fine alone or in addition to any other sentence, the court or a probation officer or a staff member designated by the court may grant permission for payment to be made within a specified period of time or in specified installments. If no such permission is embodied in the sentence the fine shall be payable immediately.
|
Payment plan/installment plan | All | No |
|
Add to Dashboard
|
Maine | Me. Rev. Stat. tit 17-A § 1710 | Modification of payment of fine |
If a convicted person who has been sentenced to pay a fine is in danger of default, that person shall move the court for a modification of time or method of payment to avoid a default. The court may modify its prior order to allow additional time for payment or to reduce the amount of each installment.
|
Payment plan/installment plan | All | Yes |
|
Add to Dashboard
|
Maine | Me. Rev. Stat. tit 17-A § 2015(3)(B) | Restitution: Default |
B. If it appears that the default is excusable, the court may give the offender additional time for payment or may reduce the amount of each installment. |
Payment plan/installment plan | All | No |
|
Add to Dashboard
|
North Dakota | N.D. Cent. Code § 12.1-32-05(2) | Imposition of fine--Response to nonpayment |
The court may allow the defendant to pay any fine imposed in installments. When a defendant is sentenced to pay a fine, the court shall not impose at the same + See moretime an alternative sentence to be served in the event that the fine is not paid.
|
Payment plan/installment plan | All | No |
|
Add to Dashboard
|
North Dakota | N.D. Cent. Code § 12.1-32-05(2) | Imposition of fine--Response to nonpayment |
The court may allow the defendant to pay any fine imposed in installments. When a defendant is sentenced to pay a fine, the court shall not impose at the same + See moretime an alternative sentence to be served in the event that the fine is not paid.
|
Payment plan/installment plan | All | No |
|
Add to Dashboard
|
North Dakota | N.D. Cent. Code § 29-26-22(4) | Judgment for fines--Court administration fee--Community service supervision fee--Special funds--Docketing and enforcement |
A judgment that the defendant pay a fine or fees, or both, may be docketed and if docketed constitutes a lien upon the real estate of the defendant in like + See moremanner as a judgment for money rendered in a civil action. The court may allow the defendant to pay any assessed administration fee or community service supervision fee in installments. When a defendant is assessed administration fees or a community service supervision fee, the court may not impose at the same time an alternative sentence to be served if the fees are not paid.
|
Payment plan/installment plan | All | No |
The Criminal Justice Debt Reform Builder is a project of the National Criminal Justice Debt Initiative of the Criminal Justice Policy Program at Harvard Law School in collaboration with the Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society at Harvard University and with user experience design by metaLAB (at) Harvard.
For more information, please visit cjpp.law.harvard.edu.