Criminal Justice Policy Program at Harvard Law School
50-State Criminal Justice Debt Reform Builder Bringing transparency to areas of significant legal complexity.
50-State Criminal Justice Debt Reform Builder Bringing transparency to areas of significant legal complexity.
Ability to Pay
Keyword search across all of the laws in the states. Subject-area tabs above allow you to narrow results. Click the advanced search for further refinement.
Every law can be saved to the Reform Builder
See all ability to pay policy recommendations in CJPP’s Policy Guide
State
- Alabama (10)
- Alaska (7)
- Arizona (5)
- Arkansas (2)
- California (41)
- Colorado (24)
- Connecticut (5)
- Delaware (3)
- Florida (26)
- Georgia (9)
- Hawaii (8)
- Idaho (13)
- Illinois (17)
- Indiana (6)
- Iowa (8)
- Kansas (3)
- Kentucky (9)
- Louisiana (8)
- Maine (6)
- Maryland (3)
- Massachusetts (23)
- Michigan (8)
- Minnesota (13)
- Mississippi (2)
- Missouri (10)
- Montana (8)
- Nebraska (10)
- Nevada (4)
- New Hampshire (20)
- New Jersey (5)
- New Mexico (13)
- New York (3)
- North Carolina (14)
- North Dakota (4)
- Ohio (27)
- (-) Oklahoma (5)
- Oregon (7)
- Pennsylvania (1)
- Rhode Island (2)
- South Carolina (5)
- South Dakota (9)
- Tennessee (4)
- Texas (11)
- (-) Utah (3)
- Vermont (5)
- Virginia (4)
- Washington (12)
- Washington DC (2)
- West Virginia (5)
- Wisconsin (6)
- Wyoming (5)
Keyword search
Reset
Reset all filtersTimeline
Burden of proof
Method of determination
Mandatory
Narrrow results
Level of Offense
Below are the ability to pay laws that meet your search criteria. Many include a See related provisions prompt which searches our database for laws that may pertain to your result.
8 Results
| State | Statute | Description/Statute Name | Statutory language | Level of offense | Definition of ability to pay | Timeline | Burden of proof | Method of determination | Mandatory | Remedies if unable to pay | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Add to Dashboard
|
Oklahoma | Okla. Stat. tit. 22, § 988.9 | Fees and costs |
In hardship cases the supervising agency may expressly waive all or part of the fee. No supervising agency participating in a local community sentencing system shall deny any offender supervision + See moreservices for the sole reason that the offender is indigent.
|
All | Not provided for | Not provided for | Not provided for | Administrative decision | No |
Waiver of fee |
|
Add to Dashboard
|
Oklahoma | Okla. Stat. tit. 22, § 471.6H | Final eligibility hearing--Acceptance into program--Duration of participation--Costs and fees--Driving privileges |
Court orders for costs and fees shall remain an obligation of the offender until fully paid; provided, however, once the offender has successfully completed the drug court program, the drug + See morecourt judge shall have the discretion to expressly waive all or part of the costs and fees provided for in this subsection if, in the opinion of the drug court judge, continued payment of the costs and fees by the offender would create a financial hardship for the offender. Offenders who have not fully paid all costs and fees pursuant to court order but who have otherwise successfully completed the drug court program shall not be counted as an active drug court participant for purposes of drug court contracts or program participant numbers.
|
All |
No financial hardship |
At enforcement of fine or fee | Not provided for | Not provided for | No |
Waiver of fee |
|
Add to Dashboard
|
Oklahoma | Okla. Stat. tit. 22, § 60.2C | Protective order--Petition--Complaint requirement for certain stalking victims--Fees | the court shall have authority to waive the costs and fees if the court finds that the party does not have the ability to pay the costs and fees. | All | Not provided for | Not provided for | Not provided for | Not provided for | No |
Waiver of costs |
|
Add to Dashboard
|
Oklahoma | Okla. Stat. tit. 22, § 1355.14E | Payment of costs of representation--Fee schedule |
The fees shall be assessed unless ordered waived upon good cause shown by the indigent person, or unless another amount is specifically requested by counsel for the indigent person and + See moreis approved by the court.
|
All |
Not indigent |
At defendant's request before imposition of fine or fee | Burden on defendant to show inability to pay | Not provided for | No |
Waiver of fee |
|
Add to Dashboard
|
Oklahoma | Okla. Stat. tit. 22, § 1355A | Application for representation by the System |
except that the court may, based upon the financial information submitted, defer all or part of the fee if the court determines that the person does not have the financial + See moreresources to pay the fee at time of application, to attach as a court fee upon conviction.
|
All | Not provided for | At enforcement of fine or fee | Burden on defendant to show inability to pay | Determined by judge without hearing | No |
Deferment of fee |
|
Add to Dashboard
|
Utah | Utah R. Crim. P. 15 | Expert Witnesses |
Upon showing that a defendant is financially unable to pay the fees of an expert whose services are necessary for adequate defense, the witness fee shall be paid as if + See morehe were called on behalf of the prosecution.
|
All |
unable to pay fees |
Before imposition of fine or fee | Burden on defendant to show inability to pay | Not provided for | No |
costs covered by state |
|
Add to Dashboard
|
Utah | Utah Code Ann. § 76-3-201.1 | Collection of criminal judgments--reduce fines |
When a defendant defaults in the payment of a criminal judgment account receivable or any installment of that receivable, the court, on motion of the prosecution, victim, or upon its + See moreown motion may: (a) order the defendant to appear and show cause why the default should not be treated as contempt of court; or (b) issue a warrant of arrest... (5) If it appears to the satisfaction of the court that the default is not contempt, the court may enter an order for any of the following or any combination of the following...(f) except as limited by Subsection (6) [restitution] ... reduce or revoke the unpaid amount of the criminal judgment account receivable
|
All | Not provided for | At enforcement of fine or fee | Not provided for | Not provided for | No |
reduction or revocation of fine |
|
Add to Dashboard
|
Utah | Utah Code Ann. § 77-32-202(2)(a) | Procedure for determination of indigence--Standards |
Any defendant claiming indigence who is charged with a crime the penalty of which is a class A misdemeanor or serious offense shall file with the court a fully complete + See moreaffidavit verified by a notary or other person authorized by law to administer an oath and file a copy of that affidavit with the prosecuting entity. The affidavit shall contain the factual information required in this section and by the court. . . Indigence means that a person: (i) does not have sufficient income, assets, credit, or other means to provide for the payment of legal counsel and all other necessary expenses of representation without depriving that person or the family of that person of food, shelter, clothing, and other necessities; or (ii) has an income level at or below 150% of the United States poverty level as defined by the most recently revised poverty income guidelines published by the United States Department of Health and Human Services; and (iii) has not transferred or otherwise disposed of any assets since the commission of the offense with the intent of establishing eligibility for the appointment of counsel under this chapter.
|
All |
does not have sufficient income, assets, credit or other means to provide for payment of legal counsel and all other necessary expenses without depriving that person or the family of that person of basic necessities OR has income level at or below 150 percent of US poverty level and has not transferred or disposed of property since the commission of the offense
|
Not provided for | Not provided for | Not provided for | No |
cost of attorneys fees covered |
The Criminal Justice Debt Reform Builder is a project of the National Criminal Justice Debt Initiative of the Criminal Justice Policy Program at Harvard Law School in collaboration with the Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society at Harvard University and with user experience design by metaLAB (at) Harvard.
For more information, please visit cjpp.law.harvard.edu.