Keyword search across all of the laws in the states. Subject-area tabs above allow you to narrow results. Click the advanced search for further refinement.
Every law can be saved to the Reform Builder
See all ability to pay policy recommendations in CJPP’s Policy Guide
Below are the ability to pay laws that meet your search criteria. Many include a See related provisions prompt which searches our database for laws that may pertain to your result.
32 Results
State | Statute | Description/Statute Name | Statutory language | Level of offense | Definition of ability to pay | Timeline | Burden of proof | Method of determination | Mandatory | Remedies if unable to pay | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Add to Dashboard
|
Maine | Me. Rev. Stat. tit 17-A § 1807(6) | Conditions of probation |
The court shall attach as a condition of probation that the person pay, through the Department of Corrections, a supervision fee of between $10 and $50 per month, as determined by the court, for the term of probation. If the court does not set a supervision fee, the supervision fee is $10 per month. Notwithstanding the attachment of supervision fee conditions on more than one sentence, a person on probation on concurrent sentences is required to pay only one supervision fee. In determining whether to set an amount higher than $10 per month, the court shall take into account the financial resources of the person and the nature of the burden its payment imposes. A person may not be sentenced to imprisonment without probation solely for the reason the person is not able to pay the fee.
|
All |
financial resources and nature of burden |
Before imposition of fine or fee | Not provided for | Determined by judge without hearing | No |
may allow additional time |
Add to Dashboard
|
Maine | Me. Rev. Stat. tit 17-A §1807(7) | Conditions of probation |
7. Electronic monitoring and substance testing fees; determination of amount by court; failure to pay; use of fees. Upon the request of the Department of Corrections, the court shall attach as a condition of probation that the person pay, through the department, an electronic monitoring fee, a substance testing fee or both, as determined by the court, for the term of probation. In determining the amount of the fees, the court shall take into account the financial resources of the person and the nature of the burden the payment imposes. A person may not be sentenced to imprisonment without probation solely for the reason the person is not able to pay the fees.
|
All |
Financial resources and nature of burden |
Before imposition of fine or fee | Not provided for | Not provided for | Yes |
Reduced fine |
Add to Dashboard
|
Maine | Me. Rev. Stat. tit 17-A §1702 | Criteria for imposing sentencing alternative that includes fine |
1. Consideration of financial capacity to pay and financial burden. In determining the amount of a fine, unless the fine amount is mandatory, and in determining the method of payment of a fine, the court shall take into account the present and future financial capacity of the convicted person to pay the fine and the nature of the financial burden that payment of the fine will impose on the person or a dependent, if any, of the person.
2. Burden of proving financial hardship or incapacity to pay. A convicted person who asserts a present or future incapacity to pay a fine or asserts that the fine will cause an excessive financial hardship on the person or on a dependent of the person has the burden of proving the incapacity or excessive hardship by a preponderance of the evidence. On appeal of a sentencing alternative involving a fine, the person has the burden of demonstrating that the incapacity or excessive financial hardship was proven as a matter of law. |
All |
By preponderance of evidence that fine would cause excessive financial hardship on offender or dependent |
Before imposition of fine or fee | Burden on defendant to show inability to pay | Determined by judge after hearing | No | Not provided for |
Add to Dashboard
|
Maine | Me. Rev. Stat. tit 17-A §2005(2)(D) | Criteria for restitution |
D. When the amount and method of payment of monetary restitution or the performance of service restitution creates an excessive financial hardship on the offender or dependent of the offender. In making this determination, all relevant factors must be considered, including, but not limited to the following:(1) The number of the offender's dependents; (2) The minimum living expenses of the offender and the offender's dependents; (3) The special needs of the offender and the offender's dependents, including necessary travel expense to and from work; (4) The offender's present income and potential future earning capacity; and (5) The offender's resources, from whatever source.
|
All |
excessive financial hardship on offender or dependents |
Before imposition of fine or fee | Not provided for | Determined by judge after hearing | No | Not provided for |
Add to Dashboard
|
Maine | Me. Rev. Stat. tit 17-A §1751(1)-(2) | County jail reimbursement fee |
1. Assessment of reimbursement fee. When an individual is sentenced to incarceration in a county jail, the sentencing court shall consider and may assess as part of the sentence a jail reimbursement fee, referred to in this section as “the reimbursement fee,” to help defray the expenses of the individual's room and board.
2. Evidence. The court, in determining whether a reimbursement fee as set out in subsection 1 is to be assessed and in establishing the amount of that fee, shall consider evidence relevant to the individual's ability to pay that fee, including, but not limited to, the factors set forth in section 2005, subsection 2, paragraph D, subparagraphs (1) to (5). The court may not consider as evidence the following: A. Joint ownership, if any, that the individual may have in real property; B. Joint ownership, if any, that the individual may have in any assets, earnings or other sources of income; and C. The income, assets, earnings or other property, both real and personal, owned by the individual's spouse or family. |
All |
excessive financial hardship on offender or dependents |
Not provided for | Not provided for | Determined by judge after hearing | Yes | Not provided for |
Add to Dashboard
|
Maine | Me. Rev. Stat. tit 17-A §1854(2)(A) | Requirements of administrative release |
In determining the amount of the fee, the court shall take into account the financial resources of the person and the nature of the burden its payment imposes. |
All |
Financial resources and nature of burden |
Before imposition of fine or fee | Not provided for | Not provided for | No | Not provided for |
Add to Dashboard
|
Maine | Me. R. of Unified Crim. P. 44(b) | Right to and Assignment of Counsel |
(b) Determination of Indigency. The court shall determine whether a defendant has sufficient means with which to employ counsel and in making such determination may examine the defendant under oath concerning the defendant's financial resources. A defendant does not have sufficient means with which to employ counsel if the defendant's lack of resources effectively prevents the defendant from retaining the services of competent counsel. In making its determination the court shall consider the following factors: the defendant's income, the defendant's credit standing, the availability and convertibility of any assets owned by the defendant, the living expenses of the defendant and the defendant's dependents, the defendant's outstanding obligations, the financial resources of the defendant's parents if the defendant is an unemancipated minor residing with his or her parents, and the cost of retaining the services of competent counsel.
|
All |
sufficient means with which to employ counsel |
Before imposition of fine or fee | Not provided for | Determined by judge after hearing | Yes |
Court appointed counsel free of costs |
Add to Dashboard
|
Maine | Me. Rev. Stat. tit 17-A §1902(1) | Deferred disposition |
1. Authority of court to order deferment and impose requirements; administrative supervision fee. Following the acceptance of a plea of guilty for a crime for which a person is eligible for a deferred disposition under section 1901, the court may order sentencing deferred to a date certain or determinable and impose requirements upon the person, to be in effect during the period of deferment, considered by the court to be reasonable and appropriate to assist the person to lead a law-abiding life. The court-imposed deferment requirements must include a requirement that the person refrain from criminal conduct and may include a requirement that the person pay to the appropriate county an administrative supervision fee of not more than $50 per month, as determined by the court, for the term of the deferment. In determining the amount of the fee, the court shall take into account the financial resources of the person and the nature of the burden its payment imposes. In exchange for the deferred sentencing, the person shall abide by the court-imposed deferment requirements. Unless the court orders otherwise, the requirements are immediately in effect.
|
All |
The financial resources of the person and the nature of the burden its payment imposes. |
Before imposition of fine or fee | Not provided for | Determined by judge without hearing | No | Not provided for |
Add to Dashboard
|
Maine | Me. Rev. Stat. tit 17-A § 1607 | Prohibition against imprisonment based on incapacity to pay fine |
If a court finds that an individual has met the burden of proving incapacity to pay a fine pursuant to section 1702, subsection 2, the court may not impose a term of imprisonment or any other sentencing alternative involving imprisonment solely for the reason that the individual does not have the present or future capacity to pay the fine.
|
All |
Not provided for |
At enforcement of fine or fee | Burden on defendant to show inability to pay | Not provided for | No | Not provided for |
Add to Dashboard
|
Michigan | Mich. Comp. Laws § 772.6 | Failure to pay recognizance |
If the person so ordered to recognize refuses or neglects to provide that recognizance, the court shall commit the person to the county jail during the period for which security + See morewas required, or until the person provides that recognizance. A person shall not be incarcerated for failure to pay the recognizance unless the court conducts a hearing and determines that the person has the resources to pay the recognizance and has not made a good faith effort to do so. In determining whether to incarcerate the person, the court shall also consider the person's employment status, earning ability, and financial resources; the willfulness of the person's failure to pay the recognizance; and any other special circumstances that may have a bearing on the person's ability to pay the recognizance. The court shall state in the warrant the cause of commitment with the sum and the time for which the security was required.
|
All |
the person has the resources to pay the recognizance and has not made a good faith effort to do so |
At enforcement of fine or fee | Not provided for | Determined by judge after hearing | No |
none |
Add to Dashboard
|
Michigan | Mich. Comp. Laws § 257.908(1)-(4) | Default as civil contempt; penalty |
If a defendant defaults in the payment of a civil fine, costs, or both, or of any installment, as ordered pursuant to section 907(2), the court, upon the motion of + See morethe plaintiff or upon its own motion, may require the defendant to show cause why the default should not be treated as in civil contempt and may issue a summons or order to show cause or a bench warrant of arrest for the defendant's appearance. . . . If it appears that the default in the payment of a civil fine or costs does not constitute civil contempt, the court may enter an order allowing the defendant additional time for payment, reducing the amount of payment or of each installment, or revoking the fine or costs or the unpaid portion thereof in whole or in part. . .
|
Traffic |
"default was not attributable to an intentional refusal to obey the order of the court or to a failure on his or her part to make a good faith effort to obtain the funds required for payment"
|
At enforcement of fine or fee | Burden on defendant to show inability to pay | Determined by judge after hearing | No |
allowing the defendant additional time for payment, reducing the amount of payment or of each installment, or revoking the fine or costs or the unpaid portion thereof in whole or in part
|
Add to Dashboard
|
Michigan | Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.8729(1)-(4) | Payment of fine, default as civil contempt |
If a defendant defaults in the payment of a civil fine, costs, assessment, or, if applicable, damages or expenses as provided in section 8733(2) if applicable, or any installment, as + See moreordered pursuant to section 8727, the court, upon the motion of the plaintiff or upon its own motion, may require the defendant to show cause why the defendant should not be held in civil contempt and may issue a summons, an order to show cause, or a bench warrant of arrest for the defendant's appearance. . . . If it appears that the default in the payment of a fine, costs, assessment, or damages or expenses does not constitute civil contempt, the court may enter an order allowing the defendant additional time for payment, reducing the amount of payment or of each installment, or revoking the fine, costs, assessment, or damages or expenses.
|
All |
"the default was not attributable to an intentional refusal to obey the order of the court or to a failure on his or her part to make a good faith effort to obtain the funds required for payment"
|
At enforcement of fine or fee | Burden on defendant to show inability to pay | Determined by judge after hearing | No |
allowing the defendant additional time for payment, reducing the amount of payment or of each installment, or revoking the fine, costs, assessment, or damages or expense |
Add to Dashboard
|
Michigan | Mich. Comp. Laws § 791.225a | Projected income and financial resources |
(3) In determining the amount of the fee, the department shall consider the offender's projected income and financial resources. . . . (6) If a person has not paid the + See morefull amount of a supervision fee upon being discharged from probation, or upon termination of the period of delayed sentence for a person subject to delayed sentence, the department shall review and compare the actual income of the person during the period of probation or delayed sentence with the income amount projected when the supervision fee was ordered. If the department determines that the person's actual income did not equal or exceed the projected income, the department shall waive any unpaid amount in excess of the total amount that the person would have been ordered to pay if the person's income had been accurately projected, unless the court order states that a higher amount was ordered due to available assets or other financial resources.
|
All | Not provided for | Not provided for | Not provided for | Administrative decision | Yes |
Not specified |
Add to Dashboard
|
Michigan | Mich. Comp. Laws § 780.794(11) | Juvenile probation |
(11) If the juvenile is placed on probation, any restitution ordered under this section shall be a condition of that probation. The court may revoke probation if the juvenile fails + See moreto comply with the order and if the juvenile has not made a good faith effort to comply with the order. In determining whether to revoke probation, the court shall consider the juvenile's employment status, earning ability, and financial resources, the willfulness of the juvenile's failure to pay, and any other special circumstances that may have a bearing on the juvenile's ability to pay.
|
All | Not provided for | Not provided for | Not provided for | Other | No |
Modification of the amount or method of payment |
Add to Dashboard
|
Michigan | Mich. Comp. Laws § 780.794(12) | Juvenile probation |
(12) Subject to subsection (18), a juvenile who is required to pay restitution and who is not in willful default of the payment of the restitution may at any time + See morepetition the court to modify the method of payment. If the court determines that payment under the order will impose a manifest hardship on the juvenile or his or her immediate family, and if the court also determines that modifying the method of payment will not impose a manifest hardship on the victim, the court may modify the method of payment.
|
All | Not provided for | Not provided for | Not provided for | Other | Yes |
Not specified |
Add to Dashboard
|
Michigan | Mich. Comp. Laws § 780.794(14) | Juvenile probation |
(14) Notwithstanding any other provision of this section, a juvenile shall not be detained or imprisoned for a violation of probation or parole or otherwise for failure to pay restitution + See moreas ordered under this section unless the court determines that the juvenile has the resources to pay the ordered restitution and has not made a good faith effort to do so.
|
All | Not provided for | Not provided for | Not provided for | Other | Yes |
Not specified |
Add to Dashboard
|
Michigan | Mich. Comp. Laws § 780.794(15) | Juvenile probation |
(15) If the court determines that the juvenile is or will be unable to pay all of the restitution ordered, after notice to the juvenile's parent or parents and an + See moreopportunity for the parent or parents to be heard, the court may order the parent or parents having supervisory responsibility for the juvenile at the time of the acts upon which an order of restitution is based to pay any portion of the restitution ordered that is outstanding. . .
|
All | Not provided for | Not provided for | Not provided for | Other | Yes |
Not specified |
Add to Dashboard
|
Michigan | Mich. Comp. Laws § 780.794(16) | Juvenile probation |
(16) If the court orders a parent to pay restitution under subsection (15), the court shall take into account the parent's financial resources and the burden that the payment of + See morerestitution will impose
|
All | Not provided for | Not provided for | Not provided for | Other | Yes |
Not specified |
Add to Dashboard
|
Michigan | Mich. Comp. Laws § 780.794(17) | Juvenile probation |
(17) A parent who has been ordered to pay restitution under subsection (15) may petition the court for a modification of the amount of restitution owed by the parent or + See morefor a cancellation of any unpaid portion of the parent's obligation. The court shall cancel all or part of the parent's obligation due if the court determines that payment of the amount due will impose a manifest hardship on the parent and if the court also determines that modifying the method of payment will not impose a manifest hardship on the victim.
|
All | Not provided for | Not provided for | Not provided for | Other | Yes |
Not specified |
Add to Dashboard
|
Michigan | Mich. Comp. Laws § 771.3(6)(a) | Cost imposed as part of sentence of probation |
(6) If the court imposes costs under subsection (2) as part of a sentence of probation, all of the following apply: (a) The court shall not require a probationer to + See morepay costs under subsection (2) unless the probationer is or will be able to pay them during the term of probation. In determining the amount and method of payment of costs under subsection (2), the court shall take into account the probationer's financial resources and the nature of the burden that payment of costs will impose, with due regard to his or her other obligations.
|
All | Not provided for | Not provided for | Not provided for | Not provided for | Yes |
Not specified |
The Criminal Justice Debt Reform Builder is a project of the National Criminal Justice Debt Initiative of the Criminal Justice Policy Program at Harvard Law School in collaboration with the Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society at Harvard University and with user experience design by metaLAB (at) Harvard.
For more information, please visit cjpp.law.harvard.edu.