Keyword search across all of the laws in the states. Subject-area tabs above allow you to narrow results. Click the advanced search for further refinement.
Every law can be saved to the Reform Builder
See all ability to pay policy recommendations in CJPP’s Policy Guide
Below are the ability to pay laws that meet your search criteria. Many include a See related provisions prompt which searches our database for laws that may pertain to your result.
33 Results
State | Statute | Description/Statute Name | Statutory language | Level of offense | Definition of ability to pay | Timeline | Burden of proof | Method of determination | Mandatory | Remedies if unable to pay | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Add to Dashboard
|
Arkansas | Ark. Code Ann. § 5-4-205(e)(2);(f)(3) | Restitution |
(e)(2)In determining the method of payment, the court shall take into account: (A) The financial resources of the defendant and the burden that payment of restitution will impose with regard to another obligation of the defendant; (B) The ability of the defendant to pay restitution on an installment basis or on another condition to be fixed by the court; and (C) The rehabilitative effect on the defendant of the payment of restitution and the method of payment....(f) (3) In determining whether to revoke probation or conditional release, the court or releasing authority shall consider: (A) The defendant's employment status; (B) The defendant's earning ability; (C) The defendant's financial resources; (D) The willfulness of the defendant's failure to pay; and (E) Any other special circumstances that may have a bearing on the defendant's ability to pay.
|
All |
"The financial resources of the defendant and the burden that payment of restitution will impose with regard to another obligation of the defendant; The ability of the defendant to pay restitution on an installment basis or on another condition to be fixed by the court."
|
Not provided for | Not provided for | Determined by judge after hearing | Yes | Not provided for |
Add to Dashboard
|
Arkansas | Ark. Const. Art. 2, § 9 | Excessive Bail or Punishment Prohibited -- Witness -- Detention |
Excessive bail shall not be required; nor shall excessive fines be imposed; nor shall cruel or unusual punishments be inflicted; nor witnesses be unreasonably detained. |
All |
Fines cannot be "excessive". |
Not provided for | Not provided for | Not provided for | Yes | Not provided for |
Add to Dashboard
|
Arkansas | Ark. Code Ann. § 5-4-303(f) | Conditions of Suspension or Probation |
(1) If the court suspends imposition of sentence on a defendant or places him or her on probation conditioned upon his or her making restitution under subdivision (c)(6) of this section, the court, by concurrence of the victim, defendant, and the prosecuting authority, shall determine the amount to be paid as restitution. (2) After considering the assets, financial condition, and occupation of the defendant, the court shall further determine: (A) Whether restitution shall be total or partial; (B) The amounts to be paid if by periodic payments; and (C) If a personal service is contemplated, the reasonable value and rate of compensation for the personal service rendered to the victim.
|
All | Not provided for | Before imposition of fine or fee | Not provided for | Not provided for | Yes | Not provided for |
Add to Dashboard
|
Arkansas | Ark. Code Ann. § 16-93-104(b)-(d) | Supervision Fee -- Direct Payment by Offender -- Failure to Pay |
(b) (1) When an offender on probation defaults in the payment of supervision fees or any installment thereof, the court may require the offender to show cause why he or she would not be imprisoned for nonpayment. (2) The offender shall not be imprisoned if the offender is financially unable to make the payments and states so to the court in writing, under oath, and the court so finds. (3) Unless the offender shows that his or her default was not attributable to a purposeful refusal to obey the sentence of the court or to a failure on his or her part to make a good faith effort to obtain the funds required for payment, the court may order the defendant imprisoned until the payments are made. (4) If the court determines that the default in payment is not attributable to the causes specified in subdivision (b)(3) of this section, the court may enter an order allowing the offender additional time for payment, reducing the amount of each installment, or revoking the fees or the unpaid portion thereof in whole or in part. (c) (1) The offender on parole may be imprisoned for violation of parole if the offender is financially able to make the payments and if the payments are not made and the Parole Board so finds, subject to the limitations set out in this subsection. (2) The offender shall not be imprisoned if the offender is financially unable to make the payments and states so under oath to the Parole Board in writing, and the Parole Board so finds. (d) Court costs under § 16-10-305 shall be collected in full before any fees are collected under this section.
|
All |
"The offender is financially unable to make the payments." |
Not provided for | Burden on defendant to show inability to pay | Determined by judge without hearing | Yes |
Additional Time, Reduced Payments, Revoke Fees. |
Add to Dashboard
|
Arkansas | Ark. Code Ann. § 5-65-114 | Inability to Pay -- Alternative Public Service Work |
If a court finds that a person against whom fines, fees, or court costs are levied for violating this chapter is financially unable to pay the fines, fees, or costs, the court shall order the person to perform public service work as the court determines is appropriate.
|
All |
"Financially unable to pay the fines, fees, or costs." |
Not provided for | Not provided for | Not provided for | Yes |
Community Service. |
Add to Dashboard
|
Arkansas | Ark. Code Ann. § 5-4-303(g)(2)(B) | Conditions of Suspension or Probation |
The amount of the assessed attorney's fee shall be commensurate with the defendant's ability to pay. |
All | Not provided for | Before imposition of fine or fee | Not provided for | Determined by judge without hearing | Yes |
Waiver/Reduction of Fee. |
Add to Dashboard
|
Arkansas | A.C.A. § 5-2-331 | Cost of Mental Health Services, Examination, and Treatment of Defendant |
Rules establishing reasonable charges for the cost of treatment or other mental health services under this section shall provide for waiving or postponing the collection of the charges based on: (A) Clinical considerations; (B) The defendant's inability to pay; or (C) A court determination that the defendant is wholly or partly indigent and qualifies for the appointment of an attorney under § 16-87-213.
|
All | Not provided for | At enforcement of fine or fee | Not provided for | Administrative decision | No | Not provided for |
Add to Dashboard
|
Arkansas | A.C.A. § 16-13-704 | Installment Payments -- Definition |
(a) (1) If the court concludes that the defendant has the ability to pay the fine, but that requiring the defendant to make immediate payment in full would cause a severe and undue hardship for the defendant and the defendant's dependents, the court may authorize payment of the fine by means of installment payments in accordance with this subchapter; (d) "Ability to pay" means that the resources of the defendant, including all available income and resources, are sufficient to pay the fine and provide the defendant and his or her dependents with a reasonable subsistence compatible with health and decency.
|
All |
"The resources of the defendant, including all available income and resources, are sufficient to pay the fine and provide the defendant and his or her dependents with a reasonable subsistence compatible with health and decency."
|
Before imposition of fine or fee | Not provided for | Not provided for | No | Not provided for |
Add to Dashboard
|
South Dakota | S.D. Codified Laws § 23A-3-28 | Service of motion -- Fee |
When a defendant or arrested person makes a motion under this section, the defendant or arrested person shall pay to the clerk of courts in the county where the motion is filed a fee equal to the filing fee for a civil action. If the defendant or arrested person establishes to the court’s satisfaction that the person is indigent and unable to pay the fee, the court may waive the filing fee.
|
All |
Indigent |
Not provided for | Not provided for | Other | No |
Waive filing fee |
Add to Dashboard
|
South Dakota | S.D. Codified Laws § 23A-32-16 | Notice of appeal--Service on adverse parties--Perfection of appeal--Fee not required of indigent defendant |
. . . Whenever an appeal is taken by an indigent, assigned counsel pursuant to § 23A-40-6, no filing fee need be paid and no undertaking need be furnished to perfect such appeal.
|
All |
Indigent |
Not provided for | Not provided for | Other | Yes |
Waive filing fee |
Add to Dashboard
|
South Dakota | S.D. Codified Laws § 24-2-28 | Liability of inmate for cost of confinement — Exception |
Each inmate under the jurisdiction of the Department of Corrections is liable for the cost of the inmate’s confinement which includes room and board charges; medical, dental, optometric, and psychiatric services charges; vocational education training; and alcoholism treatment charges.
However, if the secretary of corrections determines after considering the net income, net worth, number of dependents, and any existing obligations of the inmate, that the inmate is unable to pay, the secretary may waive all or part of the payment for the costs of the inmate’s confinement. |
All |
Net income, net worth, number of dependents, and any existing obligations of the inmate. |
Not provided for | Not provided for | Other | No |
Waive all or part of costs for confinement |
Add to Dashboard
|
South Dakota | S.D. Codified Laws § 24-11-32.1 | Work release inmate — Restitution for prisoner maintenance cost |
The board of county commissioners may require by resolution that a sum not to exceed the average daily prisoner cost may be charged to work release inmates of county jails as restitution to be applied toward prisoner maintenance cost, including but not limited to, room and board. In instances of undue hardship, the commissioners may reduce or waive the charges.
|
All |
Undue hardship |
Not provided for | Not provided for | Other | No |
Reduce or waive charges |
Add to Dashboard
|
South Dakota | S.D. Codified Laws § 24-11-45 | Prisoner liable for costs of confinement — Waiver |
A prisoner confined to any jail while serving a sentence is liable for the cost of the prisoner’s confinement including room and board charges; medical, dental, optometric, and psychiatric services charges; vocational education training; chemical dependency treatment charges; and transportation costs as set forth in subdivision 7-12-18(4), where transporting the prisoner is required. If, after considering the prisoner’s net income, net worth, number of dependents, and any existing obligations, the judge who sentenced the prisoner to jail determines that the prisoner is unable to pay the full amount at one time, the judge may allow the prisoner to set up a deferred payment plan for payment for the costs of the inmate’s confinement or waive all or part of the payment if the prisoner demonstrates an inability to pay.
|
All |
Prisoner's net income, net worth, number of dependents, and any existing obligations |
Not provided for | Not provided for | Other | No |
Waive all or part of costs for confinement |
Add to Dashboard
|
South Dakota | S.D. Codified Laws § 16-2-29.2; S.D. Codified Laws § 16-2-29.3 | Waiver of filing fees and service costs--Motion to court; Waiver of filing fees--Affidavit of inability to pay |
29.2: A court may waive the payment of filing fees and service costs accruing by reason of a civil action or proceeding or any criminal proceeding on motion to the court upon the affidavit of the moving party and the entry of an order thereon.
29.3: The affidavit required by § 16-2-29.2 of the moving party shall state the moving party's inability to pay; the nature of the action, proceeding, or appeal; and a short concise statement of facts upon which the moving party believes he is entitled to redress. |
All |
N/A |
Not provided for | Burden on defendant to show inability to pay | Other | No |
Fee is waived. |
Add to Dashboard
|
South Dakota | S.D. Codified Laws § 23A-28-3 | Plan of restitution--Present inability to make restitution--No pecuniary damages suffered--Hearing--Condition of parole |
If the sentencing court orders the defendant to the county jail, suspended imposition of sentence, suspended sentence, or probation, the court may require as a condition that the defendant, in cooperation with the court services officer assigned to the defendant, promptly prepare a plan of restitution, including the name and address of each victim, a specific amount of restitution to each victim, and a schedule of restitution payments. If the defendant is presently unable to make any restitution, but there is a reasonable possibility that the defendant may be able to do so at some time during the defendant's probation period, the plan of restitution shall also state the conditions under which or the event after which the defendant will make restitution. If the defendant believes that no person suffered pecuniary damages as a result of the defendant's criminal activities, the defendant shall so state. If the defendant contests the amount of restitution recommended by the court services officer, the defendant is entitled to a hearing at which the court shall determine the amount. If the sentencing court orders the defendant to the state penitentiary and does not suspend the sentence, the court shall set forth in the judgment the names and specific amount of restitution owed each victim. The Department of Corrections shall establish the collection schedule for court-ordered restitution while the defendant is in the penitentiary and on parole. The Board of Pardons and Paroles shall require, as a condition of parole, that the defendant pay restitution ordered by the court.
|
All | Not provided for | Before imposition of fine or fee | Not provided for | Administrative decision | No |
Payment plan/delay start of payments until later date. |
Add to Dashboard
|
South Dakota | S.D. Codified Laws § 16-2-42 | Waiver of surcharge--Conditions |
The surcharge provided for in § 16-2-39 may be waived in the manner provided for in §§ 16-2-29.2 to 16-2-29.4, inclusive. If a fine is suspended in whole or in part, the surcharge provided for in § 16-2-41 may not be reduced. However, the judge may waive all or any part of the payment of the surcharge which would work a hardship on the person convicted or on his immediate family.
|
All |
Hardship on the person convicted or on his immediate family |
Not provided for | Not provided for | Other | No |
Fee is waived in amount determined. |
Add to Dashboard
|
South Dakota | S.D. Codified Laws § 23A-40-6 | Arrest or detention without formal charge--Assignment of counsel--Certification of indigency required |
In any criminal investigation or in any criminal action or action for revocation of suspended sentence or probation in the circuit or magistrate court or in a final proceeding to revoke a parole, if it is satisfactorily shown that the defendant or detained person does not have sufficient money, credit, or property to employ counsel and pay for the necessary expenses of his representation, the judge of the circuit court or the magistrate shall, upon the request of the defendant, assign, at any time following arrest or commencement of detention without formal charges, counsel for his representation, who shall appear for and defend the accused upon the charge against him, or take other proper legal action to protect the rights of the person detained without formal charge.
In each case, the indigent person, subject to the penalties for perjury, shall certify in writing or by other record such material factors relating to his ability to pay as the court prescribes. |
All |
Does not have sufficient money, credit, or property to employ counsel and pay for the necessary expenses of his representation; indigdent. |
Not provided for | Burden on defendant to show inability to pay | Not provided for | No |
Assign counsel |
Add to Dashboard
|
South Dakota | S.D. Codified Laws § 223A-27-25.5 | Hearing required prior to imprisonment or jailing for failure to pay fine, costs, and restitution--Burden of proof--Computation of time to be served |
No defendant may be imprisoned or jailed for failure to pay a fine, costs, or restitution or have any suspended prison or jail sentence revoked without a prior hearing. At the hearing, the defendant has the burden of proof to establish to the reasonable satisfaction of the magistrate or circuit judge that the defendant did not willfully fail to pay the fine, costs, or restitution or that the defendant did make a bona fide effort to pay the fine, costs, or restitution.
Failure by the defendant to make such a showing is grounds for being imprisoned or jailed. If the sentence provided for payment of fine or costs only, the term of jail or imprisonment may be no longer than the number of days equal to the total amount of the fine or costs imposed divided by sixty. For purposes of making this computation, any fraction of less than one day shall be dropped from the term of imprisonment. In no event may such imprisonment for failure to pay the fine, costs, and restitution together with all other time served or to be served exceed the maximum allowed by statute. If the defendant establishes that nonpayment was not willful or that the defendant did make a bona fide effort to pay, the defendant may not be imprisoned or jailed for nonpayment. The magistrate or circuit judge shall consider other alternatives which take into account the state's interest in punishment and deterrence. The court shall make findings in its decision. |
All |
Did not willfully fail to pay the fine, costs, or restitution or that the defendant did make a bona fide effort to pay the fine, costs, or restitution. |
At enforcement of fine or fee | Burden on defendant to show inability to pay | Determined by judge after hearing | No |
Cannot be imprisoned for default on payment. |
Add to Dashboard
|
Washington | Wash. Rev. Code Ann 69.50.430 | Additional fine for certain felony violations |
(1) Every adult offender convicted of a felony violation of RCW 69.50.401 through 69.50.4013, 69.50.4015, 69.50.402, 69.50.403, 69.50.406, 69.50.407, 69.50.410, or 69.50.415 must be fined one thousand dollars in addition to any other fine or penalty imposed. Unless the court finds the adult offender to be indigent, this additional fine may not be suspended or deferred by the court.
|
All |
Indigent |
Before imposition of fine or fee | Not provided for | Determined by judge without hearing | No |
Suspended or defer additional fine |
Add to Dashboard
|
Washington | Wash. Rev. Code Ann 10.73.160(4) | Court fees and costs |
A defendant who has been sentenced to pay costs and who is not in contumacious default in the payment may at any time after release from total confinement petition the court that sentenced the defendant or juvenile offender for remission of the payment of costs or of any unpaid portion. If it appears to the satisfaction of the sentencing court that payment of the amount due will impose manifest hardship on the defendant or the defendant’s immediate family, the sentencing court may remit all or part of the amount due in costs, modify the method of payment under RCW 10.01.170, or convert the unpaid costs to community restitution hours, if the jurisdiction operates a community restitution program, at the rate of no less than the state minimum wage established in RCW 49.46.020 for each hour of community restitution. Manifest hardship exists where the defendant or juvenile offender is indigent as defined in RCW 10.101.010(3) (a) through (c).
|
All |
Manifest hardship on the defendant or defendant's immediate family; indigent. |
At defendant's request at enforcement | Not provided for | Not provided for | No |
Court may remit all or part of the amount due in costs, modify the method of payment, or convert the unpaid costs to community restitution hours. |
The Criminal Justice Debt Reform Builder is a project of the National Criminal Justice Debt Initiative of the Criminal Justice Policy Program at Harvard Law School in collaboration with the Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society at Harvard University and with user experience design by metaLAB (at) Harvard.
For more information, please visit cjpp.law.harvard.edu.