50-State Criminal Justice Debt Reform Builder Bringing transparency to areas of significant legal complexity.
Poverty Penalties and Poverty Traps
Keyword search across all of the laws in the states. Subject-area tabs above allow you to narrow results. Click the advanced search for further refinement.
Every law can be saved to the Reform Builder
See all poverty penalty and poverty trap policy recommendations in CJPP’s Policy Guide
State
- Alabama (0)
- Alaska (0)
- Arizona (1)
- Arkansas (0)
- California (3)
- (-) Colorado (2)
- Connecticut (0)
- Delaware (1)
- Florida (4)
- Georgia (0)
- Hawaii (1)
- Idaho (4)
- Illinois (3)
- Indiana (1)
- Iowa (0)
- Kansas (0)
- Kentucky (0)
- Louisiana (2)
- Maine (0)
- Maryland (0)
- Massachusetts (1)
- Michigan (1)
- Minnesota (1)
- Mississippi (0)
- Missouri (3)
- Montana (0)
- Nebraska (1)
- Nevada (2)
- New Hampshire (3)
- New Jersey (1)
- (-) New Mexico (0)
- New York (0)
- North Carolina (3)
- North Dakota (0)
- Ohio (0)
- Oklahoma (3)
- Oregon (3)
- Pennsylvania (1)
- Rhode Island (0)
- South Carolina (0)
- South Dakota (0)
- Tennessee (3)
- Texas (0)
- Utah (0)
- Vermont (0)
- (-) Virginia (3)
- Washington (2)
- Washington DC (0)
- West Virginia (0)
- Wisconsin (0)
- Wyoming (1)
Keyword search
Reset
Reset all filtersType of poverty penalty or poverty trap
- Civil judgment (2)
- (-) Collection fee/interest (5)
- Community service (5)
- Condition or extension of supervision (7)
- Driver's license suspension/impoundment (3)
- Extension of probation/supervision (0)
- Incarceration (11)
- Increased fine (5)
- Other (0)
- Payment plan/installment plan (5)
- Property liens (8)
- Wage/bank account garnishment (14)
- Work program/jail industry program (1)
Narrrow results
Level of Offense
Below are the poverty penalties and poverty traps that meet your search criteria. Many include a See related provisions prompt which searches our database for laws that may pertain to your result.
5 Results
| State | Statute | Description/Statute Name | Statutory language | Type of poverty penalty or poverty trap | Level of offense | Mandatory | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Add to Dashboard
|
Colorado | Colo. Rev. Stat. § 16-11-101.6(1) | Collection of Fines and Fees - Methods - Charges - Judicial Collection Enforcement Fund |
If the defendant is assessed any fines, fees, costs, surcharges, or other monetary assessments with regard to the sentencing, disposition, or adjudication of a felony, misdemeanor, juvenile delinquency petition, petty offense, traffic offense, or traffic infraction and does not pay all amounts assessed in full on the date of the assessment, the defendant shall pay to the clerk of the court an additional time payment fee of twenty-five dollars. The time payment fee may be assessed once per case; except that, if amounts owed in the case have still not been paid in full one year after the date of the assessment, said fee shall be assessed annually until the defendant has fully satisfied his or her financial obligation in the case. In addition, there may be assessed against a defendant a late penalty fee of ten dollars each time a payment toward the fines, fees, costs, surcharges, or other amounts owed is not received on or before the date due.
|
Collection fee/interest | All | Yes |
|
Add to Dashboard
|
Colorado | Colo. Rev. Stat. § 16-11-101.6(3) | Collection of Fines and Fees - Methods - Charges - Judicial Collection Enhancement Fund |
Any fees or costs of the private counsel or collection agency shall also be added to the amount due, but such fees and costs shall not exceed twenty-five percent of the amount collected.
|
Collection fee/interest | All | No |
|
Add to Dashboard
|
Virginia | Va. Code Ann. § 19.2-354(A) | Fee to cover cost of managing installment plan |
If the defendant is unable to make payment within 30 days of sentencing, the court may assess a one-time fee not to exceed $10 to cover the costs of management + See moreof the defendant's account until such account is paid in full. This one-time fee shall not apply to cases in which costs are assessed pursuant to § 17.1-275.1, 17.1-275.2, 17.1-275.3, 17.1-275.4, 17.1-275.7, 17.1-275.8, or 17.1-275.9.
|
Collection fee/interest | All | No |
|
Add to Dashboard
|
Virginia | Va. Code Ann. § 19.2-353.3 | Increased Fine for Bounced check/declined card |
If a check is returned unpaid by the financial institution on which it is drawn or notice is received from the credit or debit card issuer that payment will not + See morebe made, for any reason, the fees, fine, restitution, forfeiture, penalty or costs shall be treated as unpaid, and the court may pursue all available remedies to obtain payment. The clerk of the court to whom the dishonored check or credit or debit card was tendered may impose a fee of $50 or 10 percent of the value of the payment, whichever is greater, in addition to the fine and costs already imposed.
|
Collection fee/interest | All | No |
|
Add to Dashboard
|
Virginia | Va. Code Ann. § 17.1-275(A)(27) | Fees collected by clerks of circuit courts; generally- Credit Card convenience fee |
27. For the acceptance of credit or debit cards in lieu of money to collect and secure all fees, including filing fees, fines, restitution, forfeiture, penalties and costs, the clerk + See moreshall collect from the person presenting such credit or debit card a reasonable convenience fee for the processing of such credit or debit card. Such convenience fee shall not exceed four percent of the amount paid for the transaction or a flat fee of $2 per transaction. The clerk may set a lower convenience fee for electronic filing of civil or criminal proceedings pursuant to § 17.1-258.3. Nothing herein shall be construed to prohibit the clerk from outsourcing the processing of credit and debit card transactions to a third-party private vendor engaged by the clerk. Convenience fees shall be used to cover operational expenses as defined in § 17.1-295.
|
Collection fee/interest | All | Yes |
The Criminal Justice Debt Reform Builder is a project of the National Criminal Justice Debt Initiative of the Criminal Justice Policy Program at Harvard Law School in collaboration with the Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society at Harvard University and with user experience design by metaLAB (at) Harvard.
For more information, please visit cjpp.law.harvard.edu.