50-State Criminal Justice Debt Reform Builder Bringing transparency to areas of significant legal complexity.
Poverty Penalties and Poverty Traps
Keyword search across all of the laws in the states. Subject-area tabs above allow you to narrow results. Click the advanced search for further refinement.
Every law can be saved to the Reform Builder
See all poverty penalty and poverty trap policy recommendations in CJPP’s Policy Guide
State
- Alabama (6)
- Alaska (12)
- (-) Arizona (16)
- Arkansas (20)
- California (11)
- Colorado (18)
- Connecticut (19)
- Delaware (16)
- Florida (78)
- Georgia (9)
- Hawaii (9)
- Idaho (11)
- Illinois (10)
- Indiana (7)
- Iowa (11)
- Kansas (13)
- Kentucky (12)
- Louisiana (20)
- Maine (20)
- Maryland (10)
- Massachusetts (15)
- Michigan (31)
- Minnesota (6)
- Mississippi (13)
- Missouri (21)
- Montana (17)
- Nebraska (9)
- Nevada (13)
- New Hampshire (16)
- New Jersey (20)
- New Mexico (14)
- New York (15)
- North Carolina (13)
- North Dakota (20)
- Ohio (25)
- Oklahoma (16)
- Oregon (15)
- Pennsylvania (16)
- Rhode Island (7)
- South Carolina (36)
- South Dakota (14)
- Tennessee (16)
- Texas (31)
- Utah (19)
- Vermont (7)
- Virginia (30)
- (-) Washington (30)
- Washington DC (5)
- West Virginia (11)
- Wisconsin (9)
- (-) Wyoming (22)
Keyword search
Reset
Reset all filtersType of poverty penalty or poverty trap
- Civil judgment (3)
- Collection fee/interest (4)
- Community service (3)
- Condition or extension of supervision (11)
- Driver's license suspension/impoundment (3)
- Extension of probation/supervision (0)
- Incarceration (18)
- Increased fine (2)
- Other (2)
- Payment plan/installment plan (19)
- Property liens (9)
- Wage/bank account garnishment (7)
- Work program/jail industry program (5)
Narrrow results
Level of Offense
Below are the poverty penalties and poverty traps that meet your search criteria. Many include a See related provisions prompt which searches our database for laws that may pertain to your result.
68 Results
| State | Statute | Description/Statute Name | Statutory language | Type of poverty penalty or poverty trap | Level of offense | Mandatory | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Add to Dashboard
|
Arizona | Ariz. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 13-802(E) | Fines for misdemeanors |
A judgment that the defendant shall pay a fine, with or without the alternative of imprisonment, shall constitute a lien in like manner as a judgment for money rendered in a civil action.
|
Property liens | Misdemeanor | Yes |
|
Add to Dashboard
|
Arizona | Ariz. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 13-804(L) | Restitution for offense causing economic loss; fine for reimbursement of public monies; notification of arrearage; review hearing |
Notwithstanding any other law, a restitution lien is created in favor of a victim of the defendant ordered to make restitution. Monies received monthly from the defendant shall be applied first to satisfy the restitution order entered by the court and the payment of any restitution in arrears. Any monies that are owed by this state to a person who is under a restitution order shall be assigned first to discharge the restitution order, including any tax refund that is owed to the defendant.
|
Property liens | All | Yes |
|
Add to Dashboard
|
Arizona | Ariz. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 13-804(M) | Restitution for offense causing economic loss; fine for reimbursement of public monies; notification of arrearage; review hearing |
If the defendant, the state or persons entitled to restitution pursuant to a court order disagree with the manner of payment established in subsection E of this section, the defendant, court or person entitled to restitution may petition the court at any time to change the manner in which the restitution is paid. Before modifying the order pertaining to the manner in which the restitution is paid, the court shall give notice and an opportunity to be heard to the defendant, the state and, on request, persons entitled to restitution pursuant to a court order.
|
Payment plan/installment plan | All | No |
|
Add to Dashboard
|
Arizona | Ariz. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 13-805(E) | Restitution and Fines: Jurisdiction |
A criminal restitution order may be recorded and is enforceable as any civil judgment, except that a criminal restitution order does not require renewal pursuant to section 12-1611 or 12-1612. Enforcement of a criminal restitution order by any person or by the state on behalf of any person who is entitled to restitution includes the collection of interest that accrues at a rate of ten percent a year. Enforcement of a criminal restituion order by the state includes the collection of interest that accrues at a rate of four percent a year. A criminal restitution order does not expire until paid in full. A filing fee, A recording fee or any other charge is not required for recording a criminal restitution order.
|
Collection fee/interest | All | Yes |
|
Add to Dashboard
|
Arizona | Ariz. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 13-808(A) | Time and method of payment of fine; conditions of probation; no limitation on restitution and other assessments |
If a defendant is sentenced to pay a fine alone or in addition to any other sentence, the court or a probation officer or a staff member designated by the court may grant permission for payment to be made within a specified period of time or in specified installments. If no such permission is embodied in the sentence the fine shall be payable immediately.
|
Payment plan/installment plan | All | No |
|
Add to Dashboard
|
Arizona | Ariz. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 13-808(B) | Time and method of payment of fines; conditions of probation; no limitation on restitution and other assessments |
If a defendant sentenced to pay a fine, restitution, penalty, assessment, incarceration cost or surcharge is also sentenced to probation, the court shall make payment of the fine, restitution, penalty, assessment, incarceration cost or surcharge a condition of probation.
|
Condition or extension of supervision | All | Yes |
|
Add to Dashboard
|
Arizona | Ariz. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 13-810(D)(1) | Consequences of nonpayment of fines, surcharges, fees, assessments, restitution or incarceration costs |
D. If the court finds that the defendant has willfully failed to pay fine, a surcharge, a fee, an assessment, restitution or incarceration costs or finds that the defendant has intentionally refused to make a good faith effort to obtain the monies required for the payment, the court shall find that the default constitutes contempt and may do any of the following: 1. Order the defendant incarcerated in the county jail until the fine, surcharge, fee, assessment, restitution or incarceration costs, or a specified part of the fine, surcharge, fee, assessment, restitution or incarceration costs, is paid.
|
Incarceration | All | No |
|
Add to Dashboard
|
Arizona | Ariz. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 13-810(D)(2) | Consequences of nonpayment of fines, surcharges, fees, assessments, restitution or incarceration costs |
D. If the court finds that the defendant has willfully failed to pay fine, a surcharge, fee, an assessment, restitution or incarceration costs or finds that the defendant has intentionally refused to make a good faith effort to obtain the monies required for the payment, the court shall find that the default constitutes contempt and may do any of the following: 2. Refer the defendant for revocation of probation, parole or community supervision and as authorized by law.
|
Condition or extension of supervision | All | No |
|
Add to Dashboard
|
Arizona | Ariz. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 13-810(D)(3) | Consequences of nonpayment of fines, surcharges, fees, assessments, restitution or incarceration costs |
3. Enter an order pursuant to section 13-812. The levy or execution for the collection of a fine, a surcharge, a fee, an assessment, restitution or incarceration costs does not discharge a defendant who is incarcerated for nonpayment of the fine, surcharge, fee, assessment, restitution or incarceration costs until the amount of the fine, surcharge, fee, assessment, restitution or incarceration costs is collected.
|
Property liens | All | No |
|
Add to Dashboard
|
Arizona | Ariz. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 13-810(D)(4) | Consequences of nonpayment of fines, surcharges, fees, assessments, restitution or incarceration costs |
If the court finds that the defendant has wilfully failed to pay a fine, a fee, restitution or incarceration costs or finds that the defendant has intentionally refused to make a good faith effort to obtain the monies required for the payment, the court shall find that the default constitutes contempt and may do one of the following:4. Order the defendant to perform community restitution
|
Community service | All | No |
|
Add to Dashboard
|
Arizona | Ariz. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 13-812 | Garnishment for nonpayment of fines, surcharges, fees, assessments, restitution or incarceration costs |
A. After a hearing on an order to show cause pursuant to § 13-810, subsection A or B or after a hearing on a petition to revoke probation pursuant to § 13-804, subsection E or the rules of criminal procedure, the court may issue a writ of criminal garnishment for any fine, fee, restitution or incarceration costs.B. The court may order garnishment for monies that are owed to a victim or the court, the clerk of the court or the prosecuting attorney pursuant to a court order to pay any fine, fee, restitution or incarceration costs. A writ of criminal garnishment applies to any of the following: 1. The defendant's earnings as defined in § 12-1598. 2. Indebtedness that is owed to a defendant by a garnishee for amounts that are not earnings. 3. Monies that are held by a garnishee on behalf of a defendant. 4. The defendant's personal property that is in the possession of a garnishee. 5. If the garnishee is a corporation, shares or securities of a corporation or a proprietary interest in a corporation that belongs to a defendant. 6. The defendant's earnings or monies that are held by the state department of corrections while the defendant is in the custody of the department.
|
Wage/bank account garnishment | All | No |
|
Add to Dashboard
|
Arizona | Ariz. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 13-912(A) | Restoration of civil rights for first offenders; exception |
Any person who has not previously been convicted of any other felony shall automatically be restored any civil rights that were lost or suspended by the conviction if the person both:1. Completes a term of probation or receives an absolute discharge from imprisonment. 2. Pays any fine or restitution imposed.
|
Other | All | Yes |
|
Add to Dashboard
|
Arizona | Ariz. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 28-1601(A) | Failure to pay civil penalty; suspension or restriction of driving privilege; collection procedure |
A. A person shall pay all civil penalties within thirty days from entry of judgment, except that if payment within thirty days will place an undue economic burden on a person, the court may extend the time for payment or may provide for installment payments. If the civil penalty is not paid or an installment payment is not made when due, the court may declare the entire civil penalty due and, if so, the court shall do either of the following:
1. Notify the department and the department shall promptly suspend the person’s driving privilege or the person’s application or privilege to apply for a driving privilege until the civil penalty is paid. 2. Order that the person’s driving privilege be restricted as described in section 28-144 until the civil penalty is paid and notify the department of the restriction. |
Driver's license suspension/impoundment | All | No |
|
Add to Dashboard
|
Arizona | Ariz. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 13-821(B) | Fines for drug offenses |
The court may suspend the imposition of a fine pursuant to this section if the person agrees to enter a residential drug rehabilitation program approved by the court and to pay for all or a part of the costs associated with the rehabilitation program. On successfully completing the program, the person may apply to the court for a reduction in the amount of the fine imposed pursuant to this section. If the person establishes to the satisfaction of the court that the person successfully completed the program, the court may reduce the fine by the amount the person paid to participate in the rehabilitation program. If the person fails to complete the program, the court shall enforce the collection of the entire fine that was imposed pursuant to subsection A.
|
Work program/jail industry program | All | No |
|
Add to Dashboard
|
Arizona | Ariz. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 13-806 | Restitution Lien |
A. The state or any person entitled to restitution pursuant to a court order may file inaccordance with this section a restitution lien. A filing fee, recording fee or any other charge is not required for filing a restitution lien.
|
Property liens | All | No |
|
Add to Dashboard
|
Arizona | Ariz. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 22-429(C) | Judgment; imprisonment for fine; limitation; lien |
A sentence that the defendant pay a fine, with or without the alternative of imprisonment, shall constitute a lien in like manner as a judgment for money rendered in a civil action.
|
Property liens | All | Yes |
|
Add to Dashboard
|
Washington | Wash. Rev. Code Ann. § 9.94B.040(1),(4) | Conversion of fine to community service (for crimes committed before July 1, 2000) |
(1) If an offender violates any condition or requirement of a sentence, the court may modify its order of judgment and sentence and impose further punishment in accordance with this section. (4) If the violation involves failure to pay legal financial obligations, the following provisions apply: (a) The department and the offender may enter into a stipulated agreement that the failure to pay was willful noncompliance, according to the provisions and requirements of subsection (3)(a) of this section; (b) In the absence of a stipulated agreement, or where the court is not satisfied with the department’s sanctions as provided in a stipulated agreement under (a) of this subsection, the court, upon the motion of the state, or upon its own motion, shall require the offender to show cause why the offender should not be punished for the noncompliance. The court may issue a summons or a warrant of arrest for the offender’s appearance; (c) The state has the burden of showing noncompliance by a preponderance of the evidence. The court may not sanction the offender for failure to pay legal financial obligations unless the court finds, after a hearing and on the record, that the failure to pay is willful. A failure to pay is willful if the offender has the current ability to pay but refuses to do so. In determining whether the offender has the current ability to pay, the court shall inquire into and consider: (i) The offender’s income and assets; (ii) the offender’s basic living costs as defined by RCW 10.101.010 and other liabilities including child support and other legal financial obligations; and (iii) the offender’s bona fide efforts to acquire additional resources. An offender who is indigent as defined by RCW 10.101.010(3) (a) through (c) is presumed to lack the current ability to pay; (d) If the court determines that the offender is homeless or a person who is mentally ill, as defined in RCW 71.24.025, failure to pay a legal financial obligation is not willful noncompliance and shall not subject the offender to penalties; (e) If the court finds that the failure to pay is willful noncompliance, the court may order the offender to be confined for a period not to exceed sixty days for each violation or order one or more of the penalties authorized in subsection (3)(a)(i) of this section; and (f) If the court finds that the violation was not willful, the court may, and if the court finds that the defendant is indigent as defined in RCW 10.101.010(3) (a) through (c), the court shall modify the terms of payment of the legal financial obligations, reduce or waive nonrestitution legal financial obligations, or convert nonrestitution legal financial obligations to community restitution hours, if the jurisdiction operates a community restitution program, at the rate of no less than the state minimum wage established in RCW 49.46.020 for each hour of community restitution. The crime victim penalty assessment under RCW 7.68.035 may not be reduced, waived, or converted to community restitution hours.
|
Community service, Incarceration, Payment plan/installment plan | All | No |
|
Add to Dashboard
|
Washington | Wash. Rev. Code Ann. § 10.82.010 | Execution for fines and costs |
Upon a judgment for fine and costs, and for all adjudged costs, execution shall be issued against the property of the defendant, and returned in the same manner as in civil actions.
|
Property liens | All | No |
|
Add to Dashboard
|
Washington | Wash. Rev. Code Ann. § 10.01.170 | Fine or costs--Payment within specified time or installments |
When a defendant is sentenced to pay a fine or costs, the court may grant permission for payment to be made within a specified period of time or in specified installments.
|
Payment plan/installment plan | All | No |
|
Add to Dashboard
|
Washington | Wash. Rev. Code Ann. § 10.82.030 | Commitment for failure to pay fine and costs — Execution against defendant’s property — Reduction by payment, labor, or confinement |
If any person ordered into custody until the fine and costs adjudged against him or her be paid shall not, within five days, pay, or cause the payment of the same to be made, the clerk of the court shall issue a warrant to the sheriff commanding him or her to imprison such defendant in the county jail until the amount of such fine and costs owing are paid. Execution may at any time issue against the property of the defendant for that portion of such fine and costs not reduced by the application of this section. The amount of such fine and costs owing shall be the whole of such fine and costs reduced by the amount of any portion thereof paid, and an amount established by the county legislative authority for every day the defendant performs labor as provided in RCW 10.82.040, and a lesser amount established by the county legislative authority for every day the defendant does not perform such labor while imprisoned.
|
Incarceration | All | No |
The Criminal Justice Debt Reform Builder is a project of the National Criminal Justice Debt Initiative of the Criminal Justice Policy Program at Harvard Law School in collaboration with the Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society at Harvard University and with user experience design by metaLAB (at) Harvard.
For more information, please visit cjpp.law.harvard.edu.